Who are they?
Who are they?
The mainstream media.
I swear I heard the judge reiterate the reasoning he couldn't be charged with a terror offence due to his motives (or lack of) not fitting the criteria, one of which being race.
So if I heard correctly, basically everyone who doesn't lead with "what they're not telling you".
I suppose the sticking point is that he stabbed and killed people of various races, so you can't really say it was racially motivated in a legal sense. However, the fact remains that he was obsessed with the Rwandan Genocide and was heard on atleast one occasion calling for a white Genocide, before putting together a library of anti white literature.Originally Posted by Yevrah
That's not to say he's not a very sick pup in various other ways, obviously. Just telling that it's brushed under the carpet, where it wouldn't be if it were a white man stabbing up a Gospel church before being found to have a load of books on Enoch Powell and Eugenics. The public are not stupid enough to not notice this and they can't hide it in a world with social media, so they need to start reporting on things honestly, regardless of demographics.
Bought and paid for.
There is definitely a bit in this about the fact that people cannot accept the fact that he's unfortunately just a randomly spawned vile murderous nutjob, people can't deal with the implications of that, i.e. that there could be another one down any street near you. They need him to be part of some sort of grand conspiracy or to reflect wider truths, which unfortunately I think he probably doesn't.
At the same time, the lengths the authorities went to at the time to squash information about him were very disturbing and betrayed that they place 'community cohesion' far, far above the truth. That must change or we will all pay horribly. We need to stop celebrating diversity and instead start rewarding unity.
How do you know all of this information?
Through the media, just not The BBC, Sky, The Guardian, etc. All of which are wither blaming Amazon or sexism.
Thankfully there are some journalists with some backbone.
Shall I cut to the chase and save everyone a few posts by suggesting strongly that those news outlets are illegitimate?
And prevent a potential repeat of Monday night's scenes on here? Cheers.
RIGHT WING media.
We should go and genocide the blacks and teach them a lesson.
Nice one hitler.
I'm autistic.
So was he.
This. Electrify the fucker.
He'll get shanked in prison.
Oh, aye. He's not living to see 20.
I feel really sorry for the taxi driver that drove him there. Imagine having to live with knowing that you took him there to do that.
Also read that his dad stopped him from going back to his old school just a few weeks before seemingly to do something similar. The bit in the article I read said he ran out of the house shouting at his son and the taxi driver to stop him. Why the fuck was he not reporting him to the authorities if he suspected he was going to go murder a load of people?
I suppose the authorities were aware of him and didn't do anything either.
I wonder if some of that might be down to the family wanting to sort that stuff out behind the scenes, rather than shop out their mental kid to the filth. Probably column A and B, though. Cops aware, don't take it seriously enough because the family's not telling them the whole story.
I spent my whole childhood being warned that if I did crimes then I'd be shopped straight in by the folks. Call it the opposite of the Biden approach, and seemingly more effective.
I mean yes and no. What can you do in that instance?
Plus his colleagues will have it in for him when the government bans taxis.
Doubt it, they’ll have him in high risk with the nonces and other such delinquents
I would imagine that in this instance even the nonces think what he did was too much.
Probably, but nonces are usually weak little retards.
Nothing, but it'll still affect you however much you try to justify it to yourself. My mate was driving a train that hit someone on a failed level crossing. Scars for life.
Everyone is different though. I know one train driver who had about 9 fatalities in his career and didnt give a shit.
That's totally different lol.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9vmr14dnn0o
I'm absolutely stunned that the cunt is a wife beater.
I think there's only noncery left and he'll have attained scumbag level in every possible area.
Famously described his brother's murdering someone as 'a scuffle'.
I just saw on the local news a report on what is happening in Rotherham as part of its capacity as "Children's Capital of Culture 2025".....
https://www.childrenscapitalofculture.co.uk
I mean I know they couldn't be any more in need of a rebrand when it comes to child welfare over that neck of the woods, but fucking hell.
Why don't we retroactively name Auschwitz "Number One Holiday Destination for Jews 1939-1945" while we're at it.
This what happens when out of touch people in powerful positions, don't realise that they're out of touch people. You can only imagine there's hundreds of underlings that have been stood around too scared to say how mental and transparent it is.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj48571qq7vo
Well then just shit yourself I guess...?Increasingly, you run into a new problem: a little metal number pad, locking out anyone without a receipt and a keycode. In smaller establishments it might be a key dangling on a string and a lump of wood, but it amounts to the same thing.
Many places have a "no loo for non-customers" rule, and some are finding stricter ways to enforce it.
[...]
But it's too costly to always buy something, she says. "Coffees are like Ł4, I don't really fancy paying that to go in and use the toilet."
I saw that at the weekend. Why should business have to fill in a whole on what is in essence a public service because local councils aren't providing it?
But councils are providing it. This is people not knowing where to look.
I think having a civil conscience should be one of the costs you pay when you are a business owner. Allowing Doris to go for a wee without strong arming her into buying avocado on toast isn't much of an ask.
You should let old ladies in but not junkies. There we are, problem solved.
Old lady junkies I suppose you'll just have to make a call in the moment.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/...public-toilets
That article's from three years ago. It's probably got worse since then.The result is a major reduction of Ladies and Gents across the nation. According to Freedom of Information data obtained by local government researcher Jack Shaw and shared with the Observer, the number of public lavatories that local authorities have funded and maintained fell from 3,154 in 2015/16 to 2,556 in 2020/21 – a drop of 19% across the past six years, which comes on top of reductions in previous years.
Wait, it's actually covered in the BBC article as well.
Last edited by Boydy; 27-01-2025 at 10:12 AM.
How about people just remember to pee before leaving home?
Yeah nobody has ever been out long enough that they might need to pee again.
If you are out and about in the city long enough to need to pee, surely you consumed something at some point? Pee in that establishment. Or just buy the bottle of water.
Obviously the places who restrict their toilet use do it because they are trying to avoid certain demographics from entering their place. You might find it annoying, but not as annoying as the place stinking of the worst smells ever perceived by mankind because the resident hobos have decided that your bathroom is now theirs.
Jimmy got it right, of course:
The lol part is that, like with everything, the solution offered is the government taking more of your money.
EDIT: Touristic places, parks, etc. should be well equipped, of course.
Last edited by Pepe; 27-01-2025 at 11:54 AM.
Look how much we're already spending on it:
Now there's 3 stories there. Firstly, we have a massive housing shortage (we know that), secondly, we have the most homeless people in the developed world (we/I didn't know that), thirdly, we are atleast better at keeping them off the streets than most.
However, as you point out, we do so at HUGE cost. Temporary Housing is an absolute rip off and it's usually squalor:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj9l8njg2rzo
I didn't know you had that many homeless. I wouldn't have guess, what with your awful weather.
I bet a huge chunk of that is ex-armed forces as well.
Having a terrible problem but excellent at hiding it from view. If anything sums up Britain, that is it.
Indeed. The whole gaff is held together with sticking plasters and duct tape.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
