The terrifying stuff is probably way out of many businesses price range. Plus jobs do tend to change fairly regularly as business/client needs change.
And some businesses really like to own their tech.
If it gets affordable and democratised, start to panic.
If it gets affordable and democratized, start your own business.
I'll have my robot dig a tunnel for me.Originally Posted by Lewis
And yet the UK unemployment rate is lower than it's been since the 70s - despite the internet, mobile and AI
Alright Raoul Sunak. Unemployment being low is because half the country needs multiple jobs to scrape by. This isn't a win.
Last edited by Spikey M; 31-03-2023 at 08:20 AM.
It'll be like how the tuna gets into the cans. You think it's going to be some modern industrial process, but it's just thousands of poorly paid Filipinos [or whoever] doing it all by hand in a giant factory. The third world human is probably the most affordable piece of extremely advanced technology going and will remain so.
I suppose the real problem will be when AI gets in on email scamming.
Tech guy Roaul and early 90s AI prototype Shinners staying calm about the impact of all this
Italy have banned ChatGPT.
I asked Google Bard if it'll take my job.
I am not here to take your job. I am here to help you. I can help you with many tasks, such as:
Answering your questions
Generating text formats of text content
Translating languages
Writing different kinds of creative content
Fulfilling all your requirements
Last one's a bit sexy
Why? It can't do crime
Probably the fact that the US [and their corporate actors] have scant regard for any sort of data privacy laws.
They’ll be the first ones the machines will kill then.
Pasta la vista, baby
Very good.
Did ChatGPT write that one?
I asked it who would win the Masters and it said Dustin Johnson so we’re safe for a while yet.
He is one of the original 'AI alignment' persons. Also, in my opinion, he lost the plot about two years ago.
End it all.
Further down the rabbit hole we go.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/65333115
Surely there comes a point where AI is regulated out of sight?
Diana next?
What does regulated out of sight mean though, as in stick such serious punishment for its use that it goes underground like child porn or something?
The story yesterday about the ultra-marathon runner who used her car for some of the race got a giggle and I'm trying to draw reassuring comparisons between the car and AI and how this isn't all pointing to the imminent destruction and transformation of everything we know but it's difficult. Yes, we don't all just use our cars to drive 4.9km in our weekly parkrun and smash our PBs but if society was founded upon covering x distance across 35 hours per week, I'm pretty sure you'd struggle to keep people away from their cars.
Some gimp also won a photography award with an AI-generated entry the other day (they openly admitted to it after the event rather than trying to cheat glory).
Was it for that photo Lofty posted earlier on in the thread?
It isn't all pointing to the imminent destruction of society because it isn't AI, more a very cleverly (by standards to date) written program.
As in you're making the distinction between AI and LLMs? Isn't it just a matter of semantics given their power?
There will end up being a pretty powerful luddite movement, akin to the strength of, say, the climate change movement currently. The challenge for them will be avoiding being a load of useless hippy socialist wankers, like every previous movement against the march of technological capitalism.
It is AI. It's (probably) not AGI (artificial general intelligence), which is probably what you mean
The threat to creative industries is very real as most people aren't bothered about authenticity, but in terms of research it's not only useless but very often misleading when it comes to the finer details.
I'm not up to speed on the terminology of these things, but if it's technically AI then I'd suggest the definition of AI that's being used is wrong. Much like "Machine Learning".
True Artificial Intelligence, for me, should have independent thought and free will and this thing has neither.
Pretty sure that’s impossible.
I'm a twit
It'd just end up as ChatCBA.
Maybe, but then where's the intelligence in ChatGPT? It's just Google with bells and whistles.
This all smells a bit like 3D Printing, which IIRC should have solved World hunger by now.
Yeah, when I've corrected GPT and asked it to remember certain information for future answers, it never does. Thick af.
That's like saying true artificial plants should produce pollen and perform photosynthesis.
I assume loads of people are using it for work related stuff. Surely there's a data privacy issue there where people are pouring company data into it, because OpenAI retain the data for at least a short period (and that's what they admit to).
I completely take this back. AI is the mutts nuts. It's incredible.
I'm a twit
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-65631168Remove your tin foil hat.
That's hilarious. They absolutely don't give a fuck about customer service anyway so it's the perfect solution.
I'm paying for ChatGPT now and I got the govt to pay for my mem.ai subscription and writing credit. Absolutely loving it.
It's coming
I forget, is it the red pill or the blue pill we take when the time comes?
This is fine.He continued to elaborate, saying, “We trained the system–‘Hey don’t kill the operator–that’s bad. You’re gonna lose points if you do that’. So what does it start doing? It starts destroying the communication tower that the operator uses to communicate with the drone to stop it from killing the target.”
So basically it had a tantrum?
I always thought that if AI was given the brief of saving the planet it's answer would be 'just destroy humanity'.
That story turned out to be bollocks, by the way. It was just a thought exercise or something, not even a simulation
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
