Did he say that to Andrew? Thought he'd only said that to camera.
It's also super dull these twats pretending they're dealing with actual deaths.
"lol is we sycos cos we dont care bout murders now lol?"
Fuck off.
Did he say that to Andrew? Thought he'd only said that to camera.
It's also super dull these twats pretending they're dealing with actual deaths.
"lol is we sycos cos we dont care bout murders now lol?"
Fuck off.
He said it when Diane’s son was recruited I’m sure
Diane's son recruited?
Which of us is losing our mind here, Waff?
Have you not watched Fridays episode?
Oh, I didn't finish Friday's it turns out.
Right having caught up I see what you mean and yeah, given he already knew Andrew was suspicious of him it's pretty stupid to keep blabbing his 'Evel Knievel' plan.
Yeah his age showing a bit telling them 'I put three traitors in the ground lol', you realise you need these two on your side for it to be 3v3? Apparently if it's only traitors left the game changes into a goldenballs split steal finale.
Wait, to share or to shaft?
If that’s true then that’s pretty shitty. Especially after last year when Wilf only lost because Kieran literally said he was a wolf and got away with itOriginally Posted by Lofty
I am not certain but people who have watched the international versions reckon that's what happens.
That was disappointing. Hard to see how Harry doesn't walk it from here.
Israel killing thousands of little kids whilst being supported by your government is bad but I'd love to see the even greater magnitude of protests on the nation's streets if Harry wins this.
Went perfectly for him which made it a dull af episode and I presume he's got Zack killed off to theoretically solidify the Jasmine votes. The pivot to Andrew is easily done with the Ross argument but surely it can't all go to plan. Did Andrew not say he knew about the medal? If that can be corroborated then he could out Harry. Hopefully Mollie summons a second braincell from somewhere and goes after Andrew instead of listening to her crush.
The ability to turn/recruit people makes this so dull. I suppose that plank Ross could have refused [could he?] which would have made a lot more sense but he didn't as he, like most of them, is functionally retarded.
You just get the investigator brain cells going "I knew it all along" when the day 1 baddie gets bopped.
Game really needs a seer.
Was quite annoying watching smug Zack get it right, but for the wrong reasons. He thinks he's a genius.
Ross also made a right hash of that. His only hope was to go balls deep with the theory of a recruitment rather than a failed murder. He floated it once then gave up.
Ross had one card to play, his mum, and he didn't. He could've had dropped that bomb at Breakfast and made the point that he wouldn't have killed off his mum.
Zack is annoying but he is at least enjoying the game, clowns like Jasmine take it personally and get personal with their insults then wonder why being aggressive is getting them votes.
There are a few problems with the format I expect them to tweak in the next series (applications open now if you fancy it) the main one being any faithful with initiative is quickly dispatched whilst the thickos coast to the final.
I think there needs to be other protection methods beyond the shield, similar to the doctor in Werewolf.
There was an enormous amount of seethe on last night's episode.
They do definitely need to give the faithfuls more to work on though as this vibes based shit is just annoying. I've found this diverting enough to stick on and turn my brain off but not sure I'll bother with another series.
This is a point I'd missed, if they in hone on it, it'll point to a recent recruitment and Harry (and Andrew) will be done for.
If Ross had let it slip about his mum being in it I don't think it would have helped him it'd just have been another lie that he was hiding so what else isn't he telling us and all that bollocks. Like the girl last time not telling everyone she was a corpse in Holby City once because one hundred percent a top flight actor would definitely be a traitor, one hundred percent.
I wonder if they could incorporate something into the tasks where failure due to sabotage siphons money off to a special traitors pot so the tasks feel more part of the full game rather than them cutting away to It's A Knockout for 15 mins of each episode.
Something like this would be a big improvement. Something they can be actively caught out doing.
lll
If they knock off Evie first at tomorrow’s round table do the traitors win as it’s 2v2?
Think she said they keep voting until they're all agreed no traitors are left but if any traitors are left its them who win.
If Jaz really is suspicious of Harry I think he's left it too late to do anything about it, none of them seem to have it in them to query why he's both never been under any scrutiny in the round table but hasn't been bumped off.... aside from the one time they reckon they conveniently tried to shank hin when he had a shield.
Ignore my comment anyway, Harry is 100% turning on Andrew to take the money for himself if he has the opportunity.
Harry should really just keep Mollie on Andrew and get Evie or Jaz on board, Andrew goes and they all should end the game. If Evie goes it gets a bit messy with the 2v2 as Mollie and Harry will go Andrew, and Jaz and Andrew can go Harry and possibly sway Mollie. Not sure what happens if they keep having a 2-2 draw.
I don't see any scenario where Mollie votes for Harry. I can't wait to see her face when it's just her and Harry left at the end.
For FUCKS sake.
I didn't want Harry to win but when she voted for the one person who wanted to vote again, fucking hell.
"It's not you is it?" as they're voting to win 95 grand
That was an unexpected extra round, big up Jas for keeping his dignity but brother, we're still about 20 years off your brown ass being looked on as an equal human being to these white sisters. If she'd gone with who she actually thought was likelier to be a faithful he would have won but instead she went for whose sausage she wanted a go on. And why the fuck did Andrew (or any of the other 2) not throw out the shield situation, that would have killed off Harry instantly ffs.
Could be editing making him look worse but a few times through the show Jaz had the right questions for traitors but then didn't say them when actually at the round table. Also that episode was even more full of filler than the others.
He played the game well, but perhaps sensibly thought there was no real hope in persuading the myriad retards who were all irrevocably beholden to Paul, what that the ginger guy, and Harry. He actually completely nailed it as there was no logical reason for him to have done that last re-vote thing if he was a baddie, but half a brain cell and several disabilities let him down.
If he had asked any of those questions at the round table he'd have been bumped off ages before the final.
If he wanted to keep his head down he could still have brought it up during the final, when he talked sense about Harry but only to the camera. Or at least he only talked it through to the camera, then half-arsed it in the room.
Forgot Ian left the forum, the massive flange.
Anyway, that seer role completely ruined the last episode
Yeah, although I think it peaked last year. No one is going to solo the wolf role so well as that guy did.
Yes The Seer felt introduced by producers to tilt the game their preferred way, which was even more irritating because the worst player won.
I don't really like most aspects of the format. The non-recruiting was probably the most interesting thing that happened. The recruit or die and then also get to kill feels like it is production/series length driven and is grossly unfair to the town, but, at the same time it is very hard for the bad guys to win as human nature always drives it down to a head to head. Using the seer, not revealing their identites all felt like the hidden hand steering the ship and, as you say, towards an outcome where the worst person won. I understand the 5d chess move with the final recruitment and failure to kill, but I'm not convinced it's ever in the interests of the traitors to not kill. Also, I wasn't particularly paying attention, but how many men did they lynch before never realising literally every woman the town killed was a traitor?
I think if nothing else they should make the red/green thing anonymous, until it's whittled down like this one where the game has to stop anyone voting to end the game will be automatically under suspicion.
I rather assumed when Claudia was collecting the pouches off if them that it would be anonymised, as it wasn't why are they not allowed to just chuck them in themselves?
I think my biggest bugbear of the whole thing was the "I'm voting for yourself" contagion which seemed to spread like wildfire. Why do people say that? Is it to sound cleverererer? I see there is already extensive online discourse in the subject.
My wife has been put on to the US version now. Why does Alan Cumming, an actual Scotchman, talk like Mike Myers in Austin Powers/Shrek? It's the sort of accent that would justify genocide.
The whole pretending to kill Leanne thing should have been the end of the series, before the Seer even turned up. If the players are aware of the rules of the game (e.g. that even if they do recruit that late they still get a murder) then Leanne was 100% confirmed as a faithful and became the winner and king maker on the spot. If the players aren't aware of the rules, what's the fucking point?
The format is largely wank though. Getting to recruit all the fucking time makes most of the game redundant. Great TV, but shit rules.
The US Seasons are alright, but the Australian ones are better. Australia S1 is probably the best series I've ever seen and Australia 2 is so shit it's impressive.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote