
Originally Posted by
Pepe
If all you're arguing is that abortion should be legal and accessible, then I agree with you, under the right terms. What those terms should be we could discuss, but I am sure that none of you can be arsed. I sure as hell can't.
The only question brought forth by the current ruling is who you think should decide under what terms (if any) should abortion be allowed:
1. The people of each state, via their state representatives.
2. The people of the entire country, via their federal representatives.
3. Unelected members of the judicial with lifetime appointments.
The current state of affairs allows for the first and the second option. The third option was the state of affairs before the latest ruling.
I guess there is a fourth option, which is 'I don't care as long as I get my way.' Judging by the answers to Lewis' question that seems to be the stance some of you have, which is fine, although it strikes me as a bit undemocratic.