Theresa May's Conservatives
Jeremy Corbyn's Labour
Tim Farron's Liberal Democrats
Paul Nuttall's UKIP
2 people's Greens
Nicholas Durgeon's Scottish Nationalists
Satan's Sinn Fein
Dr Ian Paisley's DUP
Some other bunch of nonces
I'm foreign, but I wish I were an Englishman
Some excellent poverty figures for you here. That's put me right off.
That seems like a bold assumption to make when the last election completely threw all sorts of established tribal voting patterns into the bin.
This Rory Stewart character looks like Alex Honnold if he had directed his asperger’s into politics
Do you think Michael Gove knew he was quoting Trotsky?
Javid is out, now for Hunt. The entire thing has been a shit show. It wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't real.
It’d be beautiful if they miscalculated that.
Henn0rz spot on as usual.
I've been on the Prime Minister Hunt bandwagon before it was a even twinkle in the woodsmith's eye (although no money on sadly) so here's to hoping Boris can get a few more Brits detained abroad or accidentally have himself recorded laughing off the idea of Brexit as he drives away from a rancorous mob he's just done a meet-and-greet with.
Did you see how hairy her palms were?
The only bet I would be putting on is shortest ever term as PM.
Sounds like you have a plan of some sort.
Great to see arms sales to Saudi Arabia being stopped by the courts. Predictably, Tory scum want to be able to continue killing kids and are appealing the decision.
Mark Field must he tired of working.
Chris Williamson looks like he's going to be walking back into a fucking big stack of papers in his deselection to-do pile.
It's a bit of a catch-22 really. How do you plead a media conspiracy to portray you as anti-Semitic, without, by such a claim itself, become open to the critique?
He's not an anti-semite, he just hates Jews.
John McDonnell was talking about giving Cuba financial support the other week.
"Tory scum" implied it was a Tory centric horror.
To be fair and for what it's worth I agree you have been scathing about New Labour.
It's a source of shame for Britain that we're involved in selling arms to anyone.
Apparently not as shameful as having invented industrialised society/the modern world if you believe the way Sky News have been harping on lately.
200 years ago Stephenson invented the Rocket . . . and now this shitheap in Camarthenshire is falling into the sea.
Carbon emissions since 1850 etc.
What are British politicians wading in at all on Hong Kong for? Was it not handed back in 1997? Do they still have any say there or do they just think they do?
We are party to an agreement on it that the Chinese are sort of violating, but in reality we can't do anything about it.
Declare war on China.
Our posturing over Russia and China really does make me lol.
In more important news, Boris Johnson wanting roll back sugar taxes and associated wank is the best domestic thing any Conservative Party leader has said in about twenty years.
They need the money, but they could unwind all the censorship shit around them.
The latter shouldn't be done because it's an anti-nanny state policy. It should be done because it makes forgery way too easy, and when you're charging someone one - two hours of earnings for an addictive product that'll last maybe 24 hours they'll do it.
They should do the former because it's a tax on the poor which is why they won't.
11 quid for a 20 pack of Marlboro is an absolute joke, I thought they were pushing it over here raising it to 7-8 quid in a country that earns 20 quid an hour on minimum wage.
There's an ad in a bus shelter near me that has 'Obesity' in a mock cig packet. It's trying to warn me being fat can cause cancer but all I want to do is smoke.
The tax works. Kids just don't smoke anymore.
Which was half the reason for the tax, in fairness.
What will they do when 'vaping' gets taxed to fuck?
How does cost prevent kids from smoking when they're not allowed to buy them anyway? It was the same non-logic that got plain packaging brought in.
By pestering their parents for the shiny-packaged goodness.
Nope. Tuck money and 16 year age limit, with far less strenuous ID laws.
The shops near my school would sell to anyone.
Most kids who get cigarettes get them the same way they'd get booze, by nicking bits and bobs off their parents or standing near an off sales and asking someone to go in for them.
Neither way really involves the packaging influencing them.
I thought we were talking about cost?
How does cost prevent kids from smoking when they're not allowed to buy them anyway?
Asian corner shops sell anything to anyone. The cost is what stops kids.
Why not get rid of the age restrictions but make them forty quid a packet? No parents are going to spend that.
I'm still getting ID'd for fags over in the UK to this day so I don't know how the age rule works. Kids stopped smoking because vaping became cool, cheap and healthier.
I think it's more to do with phones. They don't smoke, they don't drink, they don't shag.
How are they ever going to get cancer? The boring cunts.