FINALLY this thread got intetesting.
Theresa May's Conservatives
Jeremy Corbyn's Labour
Tim Farron's Liberal Democrats
Paul Nuttall's UKIP
2 people's Greens
Nicholas Durgeon's Scottish Nationalists
Satan's Sinn Fein
Dr Ian Paisley's DUP
Some other bunch of nonces
I'm foreign, but I wish I were an Englishman
FINALLY this thread got intetesting.
Excellent. Jimmy's trigger word was 'odd'. He'll be stealing a tractor and taking it back to Seoul in no time.
Pards comes back in the board kicks into life. I fucking love this place.
When do we get to call METLDOWN? Or will someone be offended?
I don't want to affect your life. I wish you all the luck with your life, and am pretty sure I have actually done so here on numerous occasions (because that's what nasty people do to cover their tracks). I want you to act with civility in the course of using this online community, which we both use a lot and presumably enjoy. Being insulted from left field makes it less enjoyable. You are welcome to disagree with things I post, or call my posts wrong (most of them are bollocks, this place is fun, not a competition) but if you make, yes, PERSONAL comments then I am more than entitled to stand my ground and tell you to fuck off. That doesn't make me 'sensitive' or mean I'm going to cry to my mum. That just means I am objecting to something you have chosen to post. I made that objection in very calm terms in my first reply to you, but you couldn't resist a bit more sarcasm every time. That is the girly pissiness, not anything I have done.
If you think people should just be able to take pointless insults like potato bullets then what sort of backwards, 19th century attitude is that? You should care about the interactions you have with people, and take responsibility for them. It's not narcissistic to have the capacity to be annoyed or upset by things people say to you, or to challenge their comments. The fact that we are on the internet is really neither here nor there. And if you think all that is narcissistic or weak or cissy, then you have a really knuckle-dragging view on how people, especially men, should interact. You go through all my 100,000 posts right now and find an example of where I've gone in at the man in the way that you did without engaging on the content. You won't find one, because there isn't one, because that's not how I do things.
I'm not going to deliver a withering 'you are a nasty person' load of nonsense, either, because 1) I don't believe it, and 2) unlike you I do not want to antagonise anyone or pick fights, I just want to have fun joking and debating and reading/writing posts, doing what we all come on here to do.
You alright, Jim, mate?
Pongo cut people to their core, that's not a meltdown, that's just you screaming as you're holding your own short intestine.
edit: PS. John, get owned. For all the claims of being the flamethrower of truth this is the most accurate post in here.
I called you odd, mate. If you can't take a look around at what you're doing and realise that might be a fair comment then fucking hell, IDK. I didn't realise "odd" could cause such devastation - I'm well aware I'm odd as fuck, something which has been pointed out many times. Your reaction was mental.
The other stuff is how you come across to me on here. Maybe I'm wrong. Who cares.
Boyd got less of a rise out of me calling me a paedophile than this.
You.
This is the biggest fallout on the board since Taz left because everyone made fun of his name and I think the original incident of this one might be even more minor.
Too weak to climb over the side. Especially with your oxygen tank.
Real men. Real feelings.
https://twitter.com/HannahB4LiviMP/s...74345701740551
A fucking MP.
Is that Jim's hand?
But .... nothing has changed and, even if it were to change, nobody could agree terms. Cancer is tied.
Do you think I could pull off a ring like that?
lol
I heard audio from May's self-immolation in front of Parliament and i have to ask, do MPs always do those huh-hah monosyllabic ejaculations during their sessions? It sounded like what i imagine it sounded like in the Magna Carta days.
Yeah, mostly. It's embarrassing.
Going further down the you couldn't script it rabbit hole today. May to face a vote of no confidence from her party, which she might win, and so be 'saved', until she then immediately faces a no confidence vote in parliament, which the Tory rebels see her lose.
Then, god only knows. My long terms thoughts on this, and I don't know whether I've put them on here, is that, somehow, Jeremy Hunt is going to be PM, despite being (ostensibly) hated by everyone. He'll probably ride in as some sort of Tory People's Vote White Knight and end up the next Tony Blair.
I'd rather have Gove...
I'd rather have Mussolini.
You can have Scott Morrison?
They're having a vote on something that they already voted on 2 years ago? Disgrace to democracy.
So, if May wins this vote of no confidence, but then loses one in the House of Commons, triggering a general election, do the Conservative Party's rules mandate she be the leader for that election (as she can't be challenged again for a year)? I know, realistically, you'd think she'd throw the towel in before it came to that, but that really doesn't seem to be her M.O. at all. That would probably be a suitably farcical next step.
She'd have to resign. That said, they then wouldn't have a leader, so who knows.
I’ll do it.
I'm a twit
Baz Akehurst, Tory leader. There's a six-part BBC Three sitcom.
If the form book is anything to go off these hints at standing down before the next election aren't worth the steam off your piss, because why would you, so the useless bastards might as well chuck her now if they are only really worried about that.
He'd have to resign after being caught skimming 0.08% off the treasury for every tax bill he passed.