https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-45264871
Tramp look is great.
Fairly certain I could nail that if I was hungover.
I completely misinterpreted the term 'nail' for a while there.
Bolt’s problem in the NFL would be that most non-broken plays are all timed precise patterned routes. Typical offenses have a minimum of 100 plays he’d have to memorize. Nobody picks up organized sports like that. Doesn’t matter which one.
Surely whether he’ll be any good or not will be dictated by whether he’s any good at football or not and I’ve no idea on that. Is he?
Not above a non-league level.
Surely if you've spent that much on a dog you would want to spoil it a bit. Knobhead.
Will have been a French bulldog. The breakfast likely outweighed it by a factor of three.
Just to check, this David Challenor who appears to have been convicted for some serious noncing isn't our David Challenor, is it?
Didn't ours spell it with an 'i'?
Probably just to throw us off.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45335850
Definite ghost/murder victim/pisshead
Some poor fucker who's been locked up in a Fritzl style basement and managed to escape, I bet.
Alex Jones response to the tranny porn is laughable.
https://youtu.be/bX-zGk8biek
Turns out she was sort of Fritzled. An abusive boyfriend who's apparently been found dead, having presumably shot himself when he realised she'd got away and the game was up.
Speaking of which, this cunt in Solihull who stabbed his ex and her mother to death in the street has annoyed me more than the daily diet of miserable news shite usually does. I would be against its re-introduction on practical rather than principled grounds, but would anybody honestly care if we hanged the likes of him?
We could probably get away with televised hangings, these days. Get Davina McCall or that bloke from Crimewatch to host. Complete with a 30 minute aftershow with whatever bottom-feeder panelists are available.
I would lock them in a lead coffin (with air holes and possibly crisps) and drop it into the sea. Haven't technically killed them, but the issue caused by their presence is over.
For liability purposes, it is the ocean that will kill you, not us.
Sorry to spoil the fun on this one, but you lock him up for a very long time and only let him when you're convinced he's no longer a danger.
We can't be killing people, we just can't.
Well, it's a good job the hypothetical judicial powers of this online forum haven't ran amok. Phew.
What's the point? Nobody benefits other than from a revenge point of view.
In which case why even pass sentence? If he recognises the error of his ways in three weeks let him out. He doesn't pose any danger to society.
Some people cannot be rehabilitated.
Well it is supposed to have a deterrent effect too. The difference in the deterrent effect of a 3 week sentence Vs a 20 year sentence I would imagine is substantial, whilst the difference between a 20 year sentence and LIFE MEANS LIFE is probably non-existent. Obviously I'm no expert in the field so I might be wrong.
Probably true, but those are the sort of people who continue to commit crimes in prison and never get out anyway right?
Also I'd suggest it's not purely about rehabilitation, it's also about whether they are actually a danger. There's no point in my eyes in keeping some crippled 90 year old in prison at great expense to society just so you can revel in the fact they are being punished.
I would have thought I'd say yes to that, but having thought about it I'm not sure.
I think people should be kept inside forever if the assessment is that they still pose a threat if they were released, but beyond that I don't really see the point in giving people actual life sentences.
Because if we can't bring ourselves to do people in then it's the next best thing.
If it was 100% like multiple eye witnesses solid then I'd be fine with life in solitary with the possibility of a mental hospice when it shoves them off the edge. I feel living with the repercussions of your actions is the superior choice both morally in the sense of the people and in the sense of punishment.
I'm not talking about gang stuff in that as there's an ultimate point to that pointless bit of violence. More the psycho shit.
I can't be in favour of the death penalty while the justice system still regularly convicts innocent people.
We just need to Minority Report it up.
On the topic of judicial systems:
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Academ...temsDraft.html
I agree with the deterrent point, capital punishment in its current form is hardly a deterrent. That’s why you should make the execution as prolonged and torturous as possible. Do the thing the Assyrians did where you make lots of cuts into the guy, cover him in honey, tie him to a boat and push him into a stagnant lake, and watch as maggots begin to infest his living body until he dies of dehydration. That would probably put a lot of people off in a way that the lethal injection wouldn’t. There are people in some countries who *choose* to die via lethal injection when they get too old.
I’m being dead serious, too.
No one, it just seems reasonable
You could argue no punishment fits the crime because the damage caused by the crime has already happened. And you get weird situations where the state was trying it's damnedest to keep Ian Brady alive, against his wishes.
That vicar touching up Ariana Grande is staggering. They just can’t help themselves, can they?
Someone thought it was a good idea to make a load of blokes abstain from sex, for life, then leave them alone around children. You’ve literally got a nonce starter pack there.
That whole do was weird. Bill Clinton, that Nation of Islam bloke who if he wasn't black would be utterly shunned... I suppose any televised memorial service (for a fucking singer) serves a 'purpose', but what is the connection there?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-45377707
Love a ghost ship.