Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
As before
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
As before
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
I'm torn between thinking jimmy is acting weird because
A he's lost his mind
B he's a wolf
C He KNOWS THINGS
Gonna give him the benefit of the doubt and go with C for now. As good a reason as any.
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
I just don't buy Baz's shit excuse as to why he's not taking part. Feels like he's slinked back into the shadows after sticking his head above the precipice with Friday's shambles.
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
I seconded him so I'm voting for him.
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
Look at Mokbull and Spikey just suddenly going after Pepe without a backwards glance. And no private message conversations. No siree.
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
Sticking with nomination, but they all smell.
If you don't think Pepe's been suspicious with his plethora of dead votes and banal proclamations about strategy then either you haven't been paying attention or you're just trying to cast a wide net.
If Pepe goes then I bet we'll have either Browning/AD or the both, maybe Jimmy and (possibly) Baz, though I'm with you that Baz is probably just a jaded villager
What is a dead vote? A late in the day bandwagon vote? A vote for someone who has no chance of being lynched?
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
Toss up between Byron and Lofty. Think Byron's gone under the radar a bit more so gets my vote this time.
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
I made it clear my nomination was for options, so me not following it means nothing.
Byron, Pepe and Lofty are all dodgy to me. What tipped the scale is that Lofty is the only one (so far) who has voted for Baz. The wolves, to date, have done well at influencing us to vote off inactive players who we gain nothing from, which it's clear to me is what Baz is. Anyone trying to off him over the others here, especially with no real reasoning, needs looking at.
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
Could be a tight one, this.
Lynching Baz could potentially give us more information, since he outright protected AD. If Baz is a wolf, AD would also be a wolf. I don't think that's very likely though. Out of our options, I think Lofty is the most suspicious, playing it a bit too clever, but I will wait a bit to see how the voting goes and what they all have to say before committing.
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
I'm really in the dark here (much like the previous day as well). The whole Mahow-Bruh shenanigans threw us off our game big time it feels like. I actually wanted to nominate somebody else (Vercetti and I'm still lowkey suspicious of 7om) but I missed the deadline.
I make it 5-3-2-3 with 6 to vote.
Actually let me substantiate my suspicions just in case I don't live to tell the story.
Vercetti to me has probably the perfect balance for a wolf. Participates enough with votes/nominations so as to not be seen as hiding but doesn't offer much more than that. What struck me as weird was his reaction to Taz's death:
Feels a bit like trying too hard. Murderer returning to the scene much?
As for 7om, he falls into that category of people who were very inactive, got called out and then suddenly became quite active. That said, it was just 1-1.5 day where he was inactive so he could be preoccupied with something else. Also even if you're a villager, it makes sense that you'll become more active if you're called out since you want to keep going in the game. So there's not much to target him just yet, but I think we should keep an eye on him. Feels less likely that he's a seer as well due to that:
Knowing SvN's role now, surely a seer wouldn't make such an unsubstantiated comment. Keep in mind also that this was his first post since he was nominated/called out.
As a general note, what seems a bit dangerous to me is that what we perceive as an expected behavior for a wolf (being just active enough to not raise suspicions) could also be the expected behavior for a seer, so we must be careful.
Looking at SvN's posts, he makes comments mainly about three posters.
First, Bruh, who he nominated and voted for on the first round. However, his posts didn't indicate this was based on seer knowledge and he pulled back on the second day. Unlikely found out was wolf, potentially investigated and found out villager.
Secondly, Taz. SvN said that Taz was playing as normal and nothing to gain from getting rid. I imagine SvN investigated Taz on the first night and discovered he was a villager.
Third, Browning. SvN nominated and voted for him on the second day. May have investigated him on second night and discovered was a wolf.
So I'd guess that SvN's 2 investigations (before dying on night 2) were: (1) Taz being a villager, night 0; (2) Either Bruh being a villager or Browning being a wolf, night 1.
Doesn't help us here but I'd suggest we go back after Browning tomorrow.
Amazing.
The grin of a dead man is an ill omen. What have I missed?
I know I'm dead and not meant to post but
Just realised, as we were.
I just had to go back through the whole fucking thread to check that SvN wasn't actually a seer. Cheers for that, AD.
This is escalating very quickly.
I was reading that with ever growing confusion
Outstanding
Doctors are smart. Maybe that's all he meant.
Unless SvN was meant to be a seer?
Huh. Well fair enough chaps, to be honest though I've been forgetting to log-in.
I'll be honest, I did think I might come under suspicion simply for the reason that Scouse said, I do unfortunately fit the archetype of someone sitting in the shadows. Not my intention I swear.
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
Obviously an element of this is self-preservation, but I'm not sure what Lofty is bringing either. Baz, while an insufferable cock mongrel, is at least active. Menawhile I defy anyone to tell me something Lofty has posted of substance.
Byron - 5
Baz - 3
Pepe - 2
Lofty - 4
Potential double lynching on the cards here.
Fuck sake.
At least one is a wolf out of that, I bet. Please triple lynch
I wouldn't be against a Lofty/Byron double here. Sooner we get a wolf the better and think of the scenes.
As I've said before, I feel like we're taking the sage wisdom of certain players too much at face value
AyDee's been quite vocal about multiple lynchings on more than one occasion.
Of these options I still feel Baz is the most suspect, but there's not a lot to go on.
Yeah I wanted to mention that but it's too "aggressive" a move for a wolf is it not? Could be a double bluff but a quite risky one.
I don't mind double lynching on occasion, it has its merit, however a) it is quite risky if the people getting double lynched play it strategically and b) it needs to be a decision of the priority or else the people whose votes decide the double lynch will come under big scrutiny if it goes haywire.
Last edited by Adramelch; 03-05-2020 at 04:51 PM.
I still think double lynchings get a bad rep. They reduce the # of night phases meaning less wolf kills, which gives us more control - the only downsides are less voting patterns/posts to analyse and Seers get less time to do their thing. Analysing posts is always a minefield and Seers are lucky to find more than 1 wolf before they get killed off, so don't think the negatives particularly outweigh the positives.
Not bothered if we don't but think the hysteria around double lynching is a bit misconceived.
My fellow villagers, I have curated for you the entirety of our neighbours posts within this thread. Do not fret, it is but a short read:
15 posts, five of which are nominations/votes. Also note that our neighbour goes against the accepted wisdom that double lynches are risky for the village by advocating them repeatedly, although is not quite as sold on the idea now it is his neck in the noose! It could be that Byron is just playing a poor game, or is it that he has engaged in classic wolf tactics?
I still maintain, as I always have, that double lynches threaten the very survival of our village as the odds suggest we are more likely to kill two of our own than nab a wolf.
Draw your own conclusions my friends, but we are in a critical phase here and can ill afford another botch job.
Byron - Baz - Pepe - Lofty
That's convinced me, though I'd be willing to change if some unexpected scenes unfold. What I find suspicious in those posts is not just the inactivity, it's the habit of posting without ever really saying anything - keeping up the appearance of activity without ever putting your neck on the line.