*BM x
*BM x
Not so smug now.
I suppose credit where it's due, she's not putting herself above the law.
She probably only agreed to marry him so that she could then cancel the wedding due to Covid and look leaderly.
Another in the series.
Every one of them is this.
What's going on there?
The actual whopper in all of these is the person tweeting as 'Cockjuggling Twatsicle'. I could name all of the accounts they re-tweet most often without looking.
Where are they though? And why put out a video that makes you look like a mong yourself?
If they’re that thick then it’s time to start rounding them up.
But are they that thick?
Even thickecestershire.
Finally tested negative today. Just in time for my wife to test positive this evening. FML.
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...b-restrictions
I just don't get the arguments put forward by these people. There aren't arguments, in fact, not coherent ones. Just lists of emotionally-fuelled statements that don't make sense.
What point is being made there? I don't understand. And obviously it isn't a political decision to save one politician's career. It's irrelevant to his career.We all want to return to normal. It’s why so many of us have followed the guidelines around mask-wearing, social distancing, self-isolating and shielding. It’s because we want to get through the pandemic and return to freely hugging our loved ones, travelling without fear of getting infected in transit, and also throwing and attending parties.
We are told we need to live with Covid in the long term. But living with this virus should not mean putting the lives of our most vulnerable at significant risk, especially at a time when the Omicron variant has led to such high rates of infection. If this hasty lifting of all plan B restrictions is a political decision to save one politician’s career rather than a decision based on science, data and evidence, it must be reconsidered. Lives are at stake if it is not.
We binned all mask rules as of midnight. A glorious day and may they never return.
I don't fully understand why, but these people seem to be GAGGING to live under a draconian set of rules forevermore and on Dave's point, they are the worst type vaccine sceptics going.
During the summer the "We don't want another lockdown in the future, so let's have one now" summed their position up really.
1 in 8 Primary School kids are currently off with Covid and nobody is batting an eyelid. From first hand experience, it's widely just being lolled off over video calls. Only one of the parents from my daughters class had anything worse than a mild cold, and even that was just a couple of days in bed.
It's over. Spring is coming, nobody is scared anymore and our government has rendered its self unable to put restrictions in place even if they wanted to.
Time to just ignore the whoppers and crack on. Bring on March when the isolation mandate expires.
We're getting 1-2 PIMS-TS kids a week at the moment which is the most we've ever had by far. I've never even seen one of the comparable diseases - like Kawasaki - which were around before covid.
I'm really surprised none of the media have got excited about it yet.
More of a news story if you drop the PIMS.
There was a bit on the local news here about it yesterday I think [there having been a few cases locally].
I'm not sure they're particularly arsed by that now, either.
That’s true. Up here in the North East, the pandemic ended with England’s first game of the Euros. I remember the police coming in the pub looking for a particular person and didn’t even bat an eyelid at the complete disregard of the rules.
Kids should be allowed to go to school with Covid. Heck. just stop testing kids. It doesn't matter.
Heck yeah, baby.
Until the next megatron variant arrives from Botswana that's 10x more infectious and makes us bleed from our arses.
Telling people not to get a PCR after a positive LFD was the first step to ease it in. The last test I did was coming back from Germany in September.
Working in a private university, I will probably be required to wear a mask for the next 25 years. Never met a bunch so paranoid.
It's not that easy though. It's one thing testing every cough, sneeze and fart, we stopped bothering ages ago, but if someone else in the class tests positive, your kid gets symptoms and the school demands everyone take a test, then you've got to the stage where it's more hassle to not do so.
What's more mental is my 3 year old isn't allowed back to nursery until the whole house is negative. So he's down 2 weeks of nursery, despite not being ill and that not being the actual rules. Why are these cunts allowed to make up their own rules on this shit? Especially in such a low-risk environment.
My son's nursery are bad for this, They tried demanding a PCR for my son because he had a sniffle, and I told them to get fucked because he tested positive over Christmas (a lie, but he almost certainly would have if we'd bothered) and a PCR within 90 days is pointless.
They also forced another parent to test their 2 year old son because he had a runny hose. It came back negative, so they let him back in. But then a day later they said he needed to get another PCR because, shock horror, he still had a runny nose. What two year old doesn't have a runny nose for fuck sake?
Fortunately, they backed down in both instances. But they seem desperate for any excuse to send your kid home.
You also need to learn [which has probably been either a terrible or perhaps necessary life lesson for the kids] that when someone asks if you have done a test today then the default answer is yes, yes I have.
Even the yanks are allowing lateral flows for travel. Partly because they need a result within 24 hours of departure. No PCR’s coming back that quick.
My friend's ninety-three year old nan fell over a few weeks ago. She didn't break anything, but they decided to keep her in for a few days because of how frail she is. During her stay she contracted hospital-acquired pneumonia, covid, and then sepsis. Now she's dead. If they were actually trying to kill her, what else could they have done?
What they wanted to do was send her home with sufficient care in place to support her while she recovered. All doctors know hospital is not the best place for old frail people unless they really have to be there and will discharge them at the first safe opportunity.
Unfortunately the social care sector is on its knees so cannot facilitate these kinds of discharges. More money is then spent keeping these people in hospital than it would cost to look after them at home, a proportion of them get complications (making it even MORE more expensive than the social care would have cost) and some of them die.
This is the nonsense, short-sighted system we live with.
To combat this situation, hospitals are coming up with "virtual ward" systems whereby patients are sent home but remain under the care of the hospital. They have monitoring set up so their observations can be reviewed remotely and necessary treatments are provided at home. This minimises face-to-face contact and brings with it all the other benefits of being at home vs being in hospital.
Last edited by randomlegend; 26-01-2022 at 04:03 PM.
Blood on your hands pepper ponce.
I never knew her. One less pension coming out of my taxes.
Is there much blood involved with Covid, Pneumonia and Sepsis? There's Phlegm and Pus on somebody's hands though. Rip.
Last edited by Spikey M; 26-01-2022 at 04:21 PM.