Careful, this place is built on the advice of pompous bellends.
Careful, this place is built on the advice of pompous bellends.
Almost like I revised my opinion of him after the fact.Originally Posted by Manc
Nominating yourself for a peerage is a bit self-important, as is pretending you didn't want one afterwards.
Hopefully you never cross paths with @Mellberg.
I didn't even know you could until now, I thought you had to have some old fruit tap you on the shoulder.
It seems the Americans just set themselves back to the 70's over abortion rights.
See above image.
Victim blaming (or punishing, at least) made law in the most extreme way. Love to see it.
Nevermind, girls. At least you can all grab a pistol. Gun your womb up.
It might be for the best if it forces them to revert back to states doing their own thing. It's the only way the retards will be able to co-exist in the long-term.
People pissing their pants over nothing.
Every time I read about the American supreme court voting to ban abortion / legalise rape / give assault rifles to livestock, I'm reminded of the traitor, Tony Blair, being desperate to introduce a Supreme Court over here (and sort of doing so). Absolutely mental how the glamour and money of yank politics rubs off on some people.
The place is just a dump (if you aren't rich) and it keeps managing to get worse.
The average American is pretty rich by European (certainly British) standards. If you aren't a cripple or living in San Francisco you have it a lot better, even once you've paid for your healthcare which is also vastly superior to ours.
But yes, the less we have to do with them the better.
Good job, internet.
They did not vote to ban abortion or anything like that. They rule on individual cases. If you want to lol at something, lol at the inability of their legislative branch to pass laws, which is their only job.
Go away with your facts. How can outrage be created with those?
Whatever they've done (I suspect "set a precedent") is enough for several states to immediately change their abortion laws.
But let's not get in the way of Pepe being weirdly Mert like whenever America is in the mud, bruh.
They monitor forriners on the internet, any bad mouthing/letting others bad mouth AMERICA THE BEAUTIFUL and they get their green card revoked.
If he gets deported to France, we can call him Pepé .
So when the BBC say:
Is that a lie?About half of states are now likely to introduce new restrictions or bans
A number of them had laws that would immediately enact once that decision was made.
The number of people (girls) Instagram stories being about this abortion thing is insane. (All in the UK)
I'm a twit
It’s risen the dirty war that we had for the 8th referendum all over again. That one needed left buried where it was.
:d
Yeah, women, stop letting rapists spunk in you.
I dunno if it's specifically a pro-America thing, I just think it's satisfying to roll your eyes at losers taking things seriously and feel superior to drama queens. Problem is that if you lack a bit empathy, you end up doing it to literally anything that doesn't effect you. Bet he wouldn't be so dismissive if it was the supreme court, er, i dunno, banning lycra.
No. It just means that some states have decided to do that. Just like some states have laws that allow abortion until the day of the birth. The supreme court didn't do any of that. The judicial branch does not make laws.
Nah, the country is pretty shit in many ways. Everyone seems to always focus on odd things though. As I said, if you want to lol, just lol at the fact that they have amended their Constitution once since 1971. If Congress was not allergic to making laws, then Supreme Court decisions like the one that has everyone going crazy right now wouldn't matter.
As is, over half of the states allow abortion, with many of them having laws that allow abortion for a longer period than most European countries. As for the other states, well, plenty of companies are already saying that they will pay for the trips + abortions for any of their employees, so something tells me that women will be just fine.
Incredible take.
Thank you.
The sort of companies who will pay the expenses will mainly employ girlbosses and trannies as their female quotas, and they aren't the usual customers. It's the poor ones and minorities who will be a bit stuck, but then I would expect the blue states and charity complex to fund their costs as well eventually.
'I'm pro choice but because of racism. You have never debated someone like me before.'
Can someone explain to me why Prince Charles is taking money from the Qataris. What does a royal need to earn money for. I thought it was the point.
Sounds like he gave it to charity, which if so, is much better than the alternative.
Some of it supposedly came in a holdall? What?
They're saying it's all gone to charities but has anywhere reported what those handing the money over thought they were getting in return?
Lunch with Andrew?Some of it supposedly came in a holdall? What?
They're saying it's all gone to charities but has anywhere reported what those handing the money over thought they were getting in return?
Why pay millions when a Pizza Express voucher and a pair of kids pants would achieve the same?
Thats literally money laundering.
The bloke wanted to donate, the charity banked it, declared it... It couldn't be any less money laundering unless the charity then did an equivalent amount of work for Qatar as a direct result of the donation, which there doesn't appear to be any suggestion of. The story is basically wealthy Arabs like cash.
Well it isn't and even if it was why would an overtly rich Arab or Prince Charles want to launder money?
"We need to launder some money lads"
"Ok, I know an Albanian guy in Paris who could help"
"No need, I'll give the future King a call... probably the most discrete way to deal with this"
I don't think giving money away is Money Laundering.
Unless it was to the Princes Trust or something. Then maybe (but no).
Last edited by Spikey M; 26-06-2022 at 06:43 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
