It's sinister shite as wilfully misrepresented by people like Tomkins, but I don't get the issue with giving a singular point of contact for services and powers that already existed. What's the big deal exactly?
Printable View
It's sinister shite as wilfully misrepresented by people like Tomkins, but I don't get the issue with giving a singular point of contact for services and powers that already existed. What's the big deal exactly?
I took the LOL to be a lol at the cover featuring her as BIG SISTER, which I'm pretty sure would induce a lol in any of us in that position, rather than the contents of the article.
I find her very creepy. Her face doesn't move in the traditional fashion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNpXwpYAahg
Fucking glorious on every level.
Nothing to do with Politics and you post that video every 6 months. I'm quite surprised you're not a GamerGater by the way Harold. You'd like them. It's about ethics in game journalism.
I'm curious as to how many people watch Harold's youtube video's, which he uses in lieu of intelligent comment. I never do.
Yes, you do. You've commented on the videos many I post many times and if I know one thing about you, Henry, it's that you would never post a comment about something in ignorance. Definitely.Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry
I have no idea what moronics is on about.
I watch some of them if they're reasonably short and seem interesting. I've seen that one before. Laurie Penny's a knob. She's one of those people who you're embarrassed to have on your 'side'.
I'd like to marry her one day, and I would sulk until she took my surname.
I couldn't put up with her voice.
Does the very real chance of being hectored into an early grave instantly make it shameful lustage?
Speaking of which, Jack Monroe came out (or whatever their reveal is) as 'non-binary', so you're basically gay, mate.
Are you actually serious with this now?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewis
Yeah, she was in a relationship with Allegra McEvedy for a while.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewis
Seriously? That's quite the couple. Imagine James in that threesome.
I was always serious. I'm going to infuriate whoever I marry, so I may as well go all-in.
I used to have a bit of a thing for Laurie Penny but she irritates me too much now.
I'd have to woo her being really vague about my beliefs, and then drop them on her when she's fully-committed.
'I went to that fucking breastfeeding protest, so why won't you delete all the minorities off your Facebook?'
Weirdos.
You forget about them and then they find a new way to give you a lol
Quote:
The move comes after Mr Munday's mother passed away earlier this year.
Asked on his facebook page if he was giving up on politics Mr Munday replied he was giving up "on everything."
Isn't that hilarious. Seems like he just wants to get away.
What a disgusting, disgusting man.Quote:
Originally Posted by QE Harold Flair
That is quite excellent. The fucking state of her as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by QE Harold Flair
That David Starkey appears to be smashed makes it a bit better as well.
What a mug she comes across as.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09bs3apFe3k
The perfect dissection of the left, by former Liberal lefty come good, Melanie Phillips.
Worth doing just to see that his intellectual dishonesty remains as unparalleled as ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry
In what way?
Well I for one like Harold's vids (not always, but in the main) so keep them coming.
The new board getting Dave Challoner posting means this thing is way more successful than I imagined. We've started getting guests as well :cool:
I don't agree with everything she's saying, however it is quite clear that "the left" can get viscerally angry against people who disagree with them - as if people who aren't on "the left" are illiberal, intolerant and hate poor people. Virtue resides only on the left.Quote:
Originally Posted by QE Harold Flair
It's quite poor form, really.
I had no idea Phillips was a Guardian writer/editor for 20 years.
And anyone on the left is a scrounger loving, immigrant sponsoring Britain hater but the lefts monopoly on virtur doesn't let them express it.Quote:
Originally Posted by GS
I didn't say this, which is why I put "the left" in "". "The left" and the left are two different things.Quote:
Originally Posted by phonics
Henry and Boydy, for instance, are of "the left". The likes of Tobias are of the left. The former are ANGRY all the time. The latter's just a liberal type.
I was wondering who that was. Dave Challoner. :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by phonics
It's The Righteous Mind (to use the title of the book that covers it) rather than left/right. The ranks of the left clearly contain more self-righteous wanks than the loosely-assembled right, but the likes of Melanie Philips put enough moralist graft in to cover for those of us on the live 'n' let live wing.
Who wouldn't describe themselves as part of the live 'n' let live wing?
If they were being honest with themselves most people would have to disqualify themselves from it (you included).
What about those who don't want any more Muslim immigrants?
They understand what they're on about and don't see how those are related (not that I ever recall advocating some sort of faith-based embargo on certain immigrants).
Anyway, I turned that Melanie Philips (who I don't mind generally) video off when she got onto talking about how the left doesn't like having a debate with facts and that. I'm sure I remember her calling the Question Time audience 'trivial' and 'ignorant' when they lolled at her trivial and ignorant calls to use the Syria aggro as an excuse to 'neutralise Iran'. How would that one have gone down, love?
She didn't mean the whole of 'the left' - it's a certain section of the left. The media left, as she put it. And she's correct.
And I'm afraid you've highlighted a definite inconsistency (which I know you hate) since you always say certain Muslim immigrants are the problem. That's not 'live 'n' let live'. Perhaps, to get out of this massive ditch you find yourself in, you should describe what it is you mean by 'live n let live'?
I mean letting individuals do what they want as long as it doesn't hurt other people. It's a pretty straight-forward concept that not a lot of people seem to actually embrace, and it doesn't have anything to do with immigration. It doesn't give the world the right to settle here, but it also doesn't place any restrictions on their lifestyles if they do get here.
So what have I ever said which makes you think I am not a 'live n let live' proponent on that definition?
Just to add, the argument you use against Muslim immigrants would see you described as either a racist or bigot, and probably both. Which is the thrust of her point.
The obvious place to start would be the fact you don't think cannabis (and other drugs) should be legalised. Then you've got your less-than-solid commitment to free speech. There are other things that come to mind ('sharia courts', and didn't you support the French burqa ban?), but I can't be bothered with those debates again.
I'm not sure what my argument against 'Muslim immigrants' is meant to be. I think we should be more wary of immigration from shit countries generally, rather than Muslim countries specifically (although they do tend to dominate the list of shit countries we tend to receive immigrants from), so shithead Christians and other plebs who believe in witchcraft from deepest darkest Africa don't exactly top the wish list either.
Well that would then entail a further discussion on what you mean by 'hurt other people'. Clearly the drug addled suicide merchants do harm other people and, as a further result of drugs fueling other crimes, it hurts other people indirectly as well.
How does being 'more wary' manifest itself on a practical level?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcngNMaPnD8
Tobes loves it.
He demonstrated perfectly well that he was among the many, many opponents to Scottish independence that simply didn't understand what people were asking for. To compare them to Nazis should lose him any credibility on the matter - it's just total nonsense. He doesn't manage to make any point against the differences between civic and "blood and soil" nationalism, because it's obvious to anybody sensible and not on the wind up (as his various digs at Scotland suggest he is) that the modern approach to Scottish independence has little to do with "nationalism" in the sense of where you were born.
Make it harder for them to get in than a similarly dense German (assuming we regained control of that).Quote:
Originally Posted by QE Harold Flair
I'm not interested in what hurts people 'indirectly'. Pissheads commit crimes as well, and there are people out there who think advertising turns people into anxiety-ridden wrecks.
Yeah, that's fucking ridiculous of Starkey there, He isn't half a twat at times.
Those cannabis smokers doing their mary j wana doobies and comitting crimes.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/...5118359430.jpg
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...n-started.html
From a year before we went to Iraq.
Where's the Chilcot enquiry at these days?