Log in

View Full Version : World Cup Expanded to 48 Teams



ItalAussie
10-01-2017, 11:25 AM
Utter disgrace.

They even commissioned their own report which came back saying that it will be less competitive, but make more money.

Sir Andy Mahowry
10-01-2017, 11:29 AM
What a joke.

wullie
10-01-2017, 11:30 AM
If they're going to have sixteen groups they may as well just make it 64 teams straight away instead of doing it four years later as they're inevitably going to anyway.

Mellberg
10-01-2017, 11:31 AM
Still getting away with it. Just want to see Rome burn now. England should just grow some bollocks and pull out of Russia and Qatar. It'd probably achieve fuck all, but would be more interesting than watching them get knocked out by Nepal and Sierra Leone respectively.

ItalAussie
10-01-2017, 11:32 AM
If they're going to have sixteen groups they may as well just make it 64 teams straight away instead of doing it four years later as they're inevitably going to anyway.

I'd actually be more alright with 64 than 48. At least it's a situation where half the teams are knocked out in the group stages, and half progress.

Having 48 teams offends me as a mathematician. :moop:

Yevrah
10-01-2017, 11:36 AM
I'd agree with Wullie, in that if they were going to change it and make it rubbish they should have just gone for 64 teams, which the quality obviously isn't there to warrant, but it would have at least made for a group structure that isn't a total shambles.

On the plus side, 2026 is another 9 1/2 years away and I doubt I'll care at all by then, particularly after having gone through the Russia and Qatar experiences, which will both be soul destroying in their own special ways.

Yevrah
10-01-2017, 11:36 AM
Having 48 teams offends me as a mathematician. :moop:

It's so bad, so so bad.

wullie
10-01-2017, 11:40 AM
I'd have rathered the Euros was bumped to 32 teams for a similar reason. None of this best third placed nonsense, just have your success in the group stage relying on what happens in your group alone.

phonics
10-01-2017, 11:42 AM
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Two 0-0s and a penalty shoot out win takes you through. It's an absolute nonsense.

Jimmy Floyd
10-01-2017, 11:45 AM
This marks the end of the World Cup as a serious tournament.

Giggles
10-01-2017, 11:56 AM
The China world cup.

If they don't qualify :drool:

Jimmy Floyd
10-01-2017, 11:59 AM
I saw they were trying to merge the North and South American qualifying as well. If ever there's a way of blowing America out, that is it.

It's interesting that cricket is trying to go the opposite direction, but for the same (money) reasons, with India essentially trying to stop other countries from playing.

Kikó
10-01-2017, 12:07 PM
Can't wait. After the successes of Qatar and Russia this will be amazing. They should let BPLSPB qualify for it as well and make it a club v country super cup.

Spammer
10-01-2017, 12:09 PM
I still think it'd be cool to have a one-off, FA style World Cup where it's just a knockout tournament from the off.

Yevrah
10-01-2017, 12:27 PM
I saw they were trying to merge the North and South American qualifying as well. If ever there's a way of blowing America out, that is it.

Why would they want to do that?

Offshore Toon
10-01-2017, 12:36 PM
As much as I enjoy the smaller teams/underdogs in International competition, this might dilute that enjoyment somewhat. I do think it'll be fun to see teams pop up that I've never paid attention to before. The more mental African teams and goalkeepers, the better.

Pepe
10-01-2017, 12:37 PM
It'd probably achieve fuck all, but would be more interesting than watching them get knocked out by Nepal and Sierra Leone respectively.

That actually sounds interesting.

As for the 48 team thing, well, lol.

Jimmy Floyd
10-01-2017, 12:56 PM
Why would they want to do that?

Merge them or flame America? They wouldn't like to do the latter, which is why it surprised me.

Adam
10-01-2017, 12:56 PM
The 48 team thing will be worth it just to laugh at the Scots when they don't qualify.

That would be glorious :drool:

Yevrah
10-01-2017, 12:59 PM
Merge them or flame America? They wouldn't like to do the latter, which is why it surprised me.

Yeah, the latter. The revenue streams (particularly the potential ones) must be huge.

Jimmy Floyd
10-01-2017, 01:01 PM
They're in an absolute hole qualifying for Russia at the moment, so it'll be interesting to see which refs they bribe to get them through.

Lewis
10-01-2017, 03:16 PM
I don't see how it makes things less competitive/dilutes it, because the shit teams will just get bashed out early and then the last sixteen will have the same QUALITY as always. It will just make it longer and duller (and even then we're in a minority in terms of watching loads of it).

phonics
10-01-2017, 03:22 PM
With FIFA rankings as they are, this would be the competitors in the 48 team cup.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C10autWW8AMFC4A.jpg:large

Jimmy Floyd
10-01-2017, 03:26 PM
I'm all for more Haiti, tbh.

Jimmy Floyd
10-01-2017, 03:26 PM
I don't see how it makes things less competitive/dilutes it, because the shit teams will just get bashed out early and then the last sixteen will have the same QUALITY as always. It will just make it longer and duller (and even then we're in a minority in terms of watching loads of it).

SLOW STARTERS could easily get tanked by this system.

phonics
10-01-2017, 03:28 PM
Who were the ridiculously dirty bastards, I think in South Africa, was it Honduras? They were absolutely brutal, every tackle took the guy out by a good 5 yards.

Mazuuurk
10-01-2017, 03:30 PM
How does CONCACAF have more slots than South America :cab: Has it always been like that.

phonics
10-01-2017, 03:30 PM
Because Concacaf get more votes than South America hence the 48 team WC in the first place.

Jimmy Floyd
10-01-2017, 03:32 PM
South America only has 10 countries in it, and three of them are long term useless.

Mazuuurk
10-01-2017, 03:37 PM
South America only has 10 countries in it, and three of them are long term useless.

Whereas CONCACAF has like 40 and only 2 or 3 of them are useFULL.

Jimmy Floyd
10-01-2017, 03:38 PM
Yeah, but if you said 8 South American teams are going to qualify then you might as well just abolish football in the region because there will be no competition.

It does make sporting sense to combine the Americas qualifying.

phonics
10-01-2017, 03:40 PM
40 votes is also more useful than 10 votes.

Smiffy
10-01-2017, 03:43 PM
I'm all for it. I never got what the fuss was about in international tournaments prior to the summer so long may it continue. The format is the bigger problem, three teams in a group? Nah. Keep it at 4.

Jimmy Floyd
10-01-2017, 03:47 PM
40 votes is also more useful than 10 votes.

Votes to do what? This in itself is what you need votes for.

Giggles
10-01-2017, 03:48 PM
With FIFA rankings as they are, this would be the competitors in the 48 team cup.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C10autWW8AMFC4A.jpg:large

That looks absolutely muck. I'd cut it to 24.

Kikó
10-01-2017, 03:50 PM
Just have the top 2 in a final played every month. And abolish all friendlies and qualifiers.

Giggles
10-01-2017, 04:02 PM
Just have the top 2 in a final played every month. And abolish all friendlies and qualifiers.

14 Europe, 6 South America, and play qualifiers between the rest for the other four.

Mazuuurk
10-01-2017, 04:05 PM
40 votes is also more useful than 10 votes.

Is that how it works, everyone gets one vote each regardless of country size or stature within the footballing world / ranking or whatever?

phonics
10-01-2017, 04:09 PM
Yep, it's why they hate the UK as we're 5 votes that will pretty much always vote as a bloc. It's also why UEFA have tried to push countries like Gibraltar and Kosovo etc. so they get another vote to exploit.

wullie
10-01-2017, 04:10 PM
It's the same thing that took a lot of the shine off Eurovision.

Mazuuurk
10-01-2017, 04:18 PM
Saying the Eurovision is lacking in "shine" is not quite the right way of putting it I reckon.

wullie
10-01-2017, 04:40 PM
The sequin and sparkle count is way down since it got all politicised, it used to be about the great music and showmanship.

Lewis
10-01-2017, 04:47 PM
Yep, it's why they hate the UK as we're 5 votes that will pretty much always vote as a bloc. It's also why UEFA have tried to push countries like Gibraltar and Kosovo etc. so they get another vote to exploit.

Britain also holds half of the voting power on the International Football Association Board (one of those lol hangovers from inventing everything), which means that if FIFA want to play World Cup games in quarters and add McDonald's breaks then they have to get us on board. :cool:

phonics
10-01-2017, 04:59 PM
Yeah, we were the ones that banned the Poppy as well which is quite funny.

The Merse
10-01-2017, 06:54 PM
As with the Champions League expansion in the 90s (was it 96?) I definitely don't approve.

I did agree with the Euros though - seeing as how the number of registered European national sides has just about doubled since the qualifying for the first 16 team tournament (96) began 23 years ago.

231 years since Euro 96 :sick:

Jimmy Floyd
10-01-2017, 06:55 PM
All the new teams were in Euro 96 qualifying. Belarus beat Holland within. Croatia and Czech Republic of course made the latter stages.

The Merse
10-01-2017, 07:06 PM
Bosnia Herzogovina, Kosovo, Serbia, Montenegro.

Ok that's not double. It's about double that of Euro 92 qualifying, but that's definitely not what I said and also may defeat my point about further expansion.

Giggles
10-01-2017, 07:08 PM
In fairness, you also said this is the year 2227.

Baz
10-01-2017, 07:25 PM
International football is proper turd anyway. I don't see what's wrong with 48 teams.

Queenslander
10-01-2017, 10:58 PM
Dream group as an Australian-

Australia
New Zealand
Uruguay
England

ItalAussie
10-01-2017, 11:06 PM
I'd love to get a rematch against Iran at some point.

Manc
10-01-2017, 11:08 PM
The last two World Cups have been the absolute pits. International football ended with "that" headbutt.

Disco
10-01-2017, 11:10 PM
Why Uruguay?

Queenslander
10-01-2017, 11:46 PM
Why Uruguay?

We had a very bitter home and away qualifying series in 2005.

Ended with this after our players were spat on and threatened by their fans at every given chance in the lead up to the first leg in Uruguay.

https://youtu.be/K4fOtbKUme0

Iran are definitely on the list but an Asian Cup final would be perfect.

ItalAussie
11-01-2017, 02:21 AM
Iran are definitely on the list but an Asian Cup final would be perfect.
That would be pretty special.

Incidentally, I give it ten years before the West Asian nations force the Asian Cup to go the same way as the Asian Champion's League, and keep the east and west nations apart until the final.

Still, we won so they can suck it.

Queenslander
11-01-2017, 03:55 AM
This will be tacky but there can't be many things more pathetic than watching so called grown men from those Arab nations attempting to play a contact sport.

Offshore Toon
11-01-2017, 11:39 AM
Why Iran?

Queenslander
11-01-2017, 11:43 AM
Chip on our shoulders still from the 1997 world cup qualification decider. Their diving and time wasting put them on the list of forever enemies in football.

Jimmy Floyd
11-01-2017, 11:50 AM
Football in the Arab world (stretching from Morocco all the way to Iran) is little more than the attempt to go 1-0 up and then run the clock down. They don't see that as timewasting. They see it as the normal game. Why would you carry on playing when you only need to run the clock down.

It's fucking glorious when it backfires and they suddenly all pour forward in the 88th minute, before giving up and getting sent off in petulant rage.

It's also why the region has never produced a world class footballer.

bruhnaldo
11-01-2017, 04:56 PM
Have 64 teams.

Do a knockout round to start based on the FIFA rankings of each team. So if you're ranked the lowest out of the 64 teams you would play the #1 team in the world.

Play this round. Reseed the teams based on the remaining. Have another knockout round (highest vs. lowest, 2nd highest vs. 2nd lowest... etc.)

Remaining 16 teams would then go into 4 groups based on the same rankings. Highest ranked in Group A, 2nd in Group B, 3rd in Group C, 4th in Group D. Lowest ranked then in Group A, 2nd lowest ranked into B. Etc. etc.

Round robin. Everyone plays everyone once. Top 4 teams advance to the Semi-Finals.

Highest point total gets #1 seed, so on and so forth. Tiebreakers determined by GD.

Jimmy Floyd
11-01-2017, 05:00 PM
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xpqa1KqTsdM/hqdefault.jpg

ItalAussie
11-01-2017, 08:17 PM
It's also why the region has never produced a world class footballer.
If Omar Abdulrahman ever actually left the UAE, he'd be in that category. It's despairingly crazy that he won't.

Jimmy Floyd
11-01-2017, 11:04 PM
Youssef Msakni (Tunisia) should have been enjoying a top level European career for the last 5 years but is instead pissing away his best years at Lekhwiya in Qatar for easy money. It's just how they're wired.

Max Power
11-01-2017, 11:15 PM
Aboutrika :drool:

wullie
12-01-2017, 08:27 AM
Mustapha Hadji was world class in my heart.

Jimmy Floyd
12-01-2017, 08:40 AM
The Far East has also never produced a world class player, although in their case it's because The Company comes first.

And America hasn't because of their pathetic college system.

Shindig
12-01-2017, 08:58 AM
Nakata carried a world class reputation. He was in Nike ads and everything.

Jimmy Floyd
12-01-2017, 09:01 AM
Only to get to the crapanese market. Sorry, Japanese. I got a sternly worded letter from Ital last time I used that. Seol Ki-Hyeon also in the cage advert.

Shindig
12-01-2017, 09:07 AM
Nakamura kicked a free-kick through an open bus window. ON PURPOSE.

bruhnaldo
12-01-2017, 03:21 PM
Yah, my country's hopes rely on Christian Pulisic at the moment.

So...

Pen
12-01-2017, 06:08 PM
I was against the expansion, but since it's now happening I feel slightly aggrieved that countries like Curacao, Haiti, China and UAE are looking like standard options for the World cup and New Zealand got a pretty much guaranteed spot whilst we are never going to make it to a World cup :moop:

Giggles
12-01-2017, 06:13 PM
I was against the expansion, but since it's now happening I feel slightly aggrieved that countries like Curacao, Haiti, China and UAE are looking like standard options for the World cup and New Zealand got a pretty much guaranteed spot whilst we are never going to make it to a World cup :moop:

That's where it's a load of bollocks.

Jimmy Floyd
12-01-2017, 06:24 PM
'World' being the key word. There should be a large geographical element if you want to grow the game, or else you're saying that certain countries/regions will always be inferior.

Giggles
12-01-2017, 06:30 PM
'World' being the key word. There should be a large geographical element if you want to grow the game, or else you're saying that certain countries/regions will always be inferior.

I want to see the best teams in the world at the time. Not the best from regions thrown together. That might be legitimate 'world' but it's not a legitimate tournament.

Pen
12-01-2017, 06:32 PM
I am not saying the places should've been given out proportionally in the same manner as the first 32. That said, obviously as a fan of a minnow nation that has very little chance usurping the big boys in our confederation I envy the chances some teams that I don't think are much better will have a probable chance of qualifying.

We'll make a tournament during my lifetime as half of Europe now qualifies for Euros and the World cup will probably grow to 64 countries by 2030.

Jimmy Floyd
12-01-2017, 06:39 PM
Finland are terrible, Pen. You probably wouldn't qualify for the AFCON.

Finland 1998-2001ish would have a chance of making the 48 team cup, i.e. not terrible. And you really should have made a Euros by now.

Giggles
12-01-2017, 06:43 PM
And they're still better than the likes of Haiti.

Pen
12-01-2017, 06:46 PM
I am under no illusions regarding our national team. I've seen those jokers live on four different decades now and I'm still waiting to leave the stadium after a Finland win. We might not be completely shit for eternity though and that's when competing against teams of the quality of those listed above would increase our chances of qualifying for a World cup tenfold. I'm somewhere between you and Giggles on this one. I bet the people making these decisions saw the value of those Asian spots especially, but I would have preferred to see Europe and Africa get maybe two/three more each with Asia, Oceania (they really don't ned a guaranteed place for New Zealand) and Central and North America getting less.

John
12-01-2017, 06:48 PM
And they're still better than the likes of Haiti.

How many Finland and Haiti games have you seen?

I reckon I could name maybe four current Finnish internationals, and the only one who's a legitimately top player has just been banned for ninety years for sniffing.

Giggles
12-01-2017, 06:50 PM
How many Finland and Haiti games have you seen?

I reckon I could name maybe four current Finnish internationals, and the only one who's a legitimately top player has just been banned for ninety years for sniffing.

John, go fuck off and waste your time in someone else. You wouldn't have a fucking clue about either yourself.

John
12-01-2017, 06:52 PM
I've said as much in the second line of my post. I'm not the one claiming with certainty that one is better than the other.

Pen
12-01-2017, 06:54 PM
So this is how it's going to look with 48 teams:
Europe: 16 (13)
Africa: 9 (5)
Asia: 8,5 (4,5)
Concacaf: 6,5 (3,5)
South America: 6 (4,5)
Oceania 1 (0.5)
And one place for the hosts.

Concacaf getting the same amount of new places as Europe and Asia getting more is a bit lol.

Giggles
12-01-2017, 06:54 PM
I've said as much in the second line of my post. I'm not the one claiming with certainty that one is better than the other.

I've seen enough of them to know that Finland are better. And you know full well they are too.

Jimmy Floyd
12-01-2017, 07:01 PM
Haiti and Curação wouldn't actually qualify, they just game the rankings by only playing other Caribbean teams (I think). Nobody in real qualification goes to those Central American countries and gets anything.

Pleb
12-01-2017, 07:02 PM
Oceania and Asia should merge just for the lolz.

John
12-01-2017, 07:03 PM
I've seen enough of them to know that Finland are better. And you know full well they are too.

I don't. All I know full well is that you haven't watched a second of either, and won't have done since whenever Finland last played Ireland.

It's an odd thing to be strident about something you know nothing about.

Pen
12-01-2017, 07:07 PM
Whether we are shit or not (and we are) is kind of irrelevant. It's just that when we possibly do an Iceland or get a golden generation or whatever, I'd much rather try to dislodge the likes of Panama, Curacao and Haiti whilst keeping Jamaica, Guatemala and St. Kitts & Newis behind us than trying to get in front of Turkey, Hungary, Slovakia, Ukraine and Bosnia whilst trying to keep Sweden, Austria, Romania and Northern Ireland behind us. Just to put it in a context. We might never do it with the second lot, but I'm confident we would do it at some point with the first.

We can of course argue the relevance of Finland getting to a World cup or what would they add, but I don't think its different compared to any other minnow who might make it to a World cup with the added places.

Raoul Duke
12-01-2017, 07:29 PM
It's just a ploy to get more FIFA Congress votes by expanding the number of additional countries to ones which are more easily corruptible. Why see it as anything else?

Giggles
12-01-2017, 07:35 PM
It's about joining hands around the globe and promoting the people's game. For the people. Of the globe.

Raoul Duke
12-01-2017, 07:37 PM
Whilst rifling through their pockets and fleecing them for tax-free cash :drool:

John Arne
23-06-2023, 04:45 AM
Finally some good news, Saudi Arabia have pulled out of hosting the 2030 World Cup.

Jimmy Floyd
23-06-2023, 07:28 AM
Have probably learned from Qatar that it really isn't worth the hassle.

If the South American bid loses to the fuck-up Spain+ bid I might cry.

Kikó
23-06-2023, 07:40 AM
Finally some good news, Saudi Arabia have pulled out of hosting the 2030 World Cup.

Aye because they're buying all the players to make their own one.