It has borders right now. You can check if you want. El Presidente just has to abide by his own (admittedly dreadful) constitution in issuing orders about them.
The fact that his basis for doing so is demonstrably fictitious and cooked up by old KGB lags should also be of concern to you.
Lol.Originally Posted by Mert
Wasn't it just 12 months ago that Mert was singing the praises of "checks and balances"?
I am telling you as a law student that this ruling is bananas. And I have plenty of support for it:
http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/on-t...tionwide-stay/
http://libertyunyielding.com/2017/02...strange-judge/
'Law Newz'
Before he edited it one of those links was hotair.com
Well the bloke behind it is a lawyer at least.
He also agreed with the FBI's decision to not prosecute Clinton but I'm not sure how Mert feels about that one.
Can't say much for the fact that the second link has an ad hominem in its title and immediately starts rubbishing him because he's a liberal judge.
You guys are making laughably ignorant statements about the interpretation of the constitution of a country you don't live in on the basis of your emotional biases against the leader of that country. You guys are pathetic losers from 3rd world shitty countries with an inferior economic system and quality of life, distracting yourself with our politics in the same way 14 year old girls watch Keeping up with the Kardashians. It's a sad attempt to fuel and justify away your own deep inferiority complex about your relative poverty and military impotence.
I hope you realize that.
We all have somewhere we truly belong. You're grasping for anyone to accept you.
Way to not be bothered.
What a beauty of a post
Imagine an alternative reality where his Dad moved them to Britain instead. Wearing a Union Jack get-up and trying to laud it over us because he got into Durham (which is just as good as Oxford or Cambridge)
This is outright mental.
My life's been great since I came to terms with my military incompetence.
Pathetic! Sad!
By the by, this is one of the best worst tweets I've ever seen
I'm not sure what I like more, the representative emojis or the firetruck.
Can we archive posts? Because that's is a brilliant meltdown from Mert
You're trying too hard.
Mert's just shitposting as usual. That however is a Last Supper of a shitpost.
We should continue to remove words from his permitted vocabulary, seeing as it gets us content like that. I suggest "biases" and "inferiority" next.
Mert you fucking mook
Speaking of military incompetence has reminded me of a story a guy who was back from Iraq told me. He'd been sent back on medical grounds due to a damaged spine. I asked him how it happened and he told me that one day they were clearing a path through a minefield when a bunch of Americans show up in their humvee shouting that they need to cross the desert in front of them. His group explained that the place was a fucking minefield and that they'd need to wait or go around.
They said fuck that and drove across the field, they barely got 20m before hitting a mine, the door blew off and hit him in the back. He had to go to hospital and quit the service to become private security out there because, in his words, 'If these Yanks are going to get me killed, I'm getting fucking paid.'
The front page of the China Daily today
It's a bloody good drawing of Bannon tbf, don't know why they felt the need to label him.
What's the source for that? There's nothing like that on the app, it could still be in the printed edition, of course, I just can't see any reference to it.
Front page of the print edition apparently. I'll see if I can find the tweet.
On another topic, while I respect John Bercow for being a top, top Gooner, I'd quite like Trump to try do a speech in the commons. If it was anything like PMQs it'd be fucking fantastic watching this orange man get roundly jeered by a bunch of twats.
edit: @John Arne
Here's a screen of the app
Toggle Spoiler
I see it has taken Guido five minutes to show John Bercow right up. National Treasure.
He's (Trump) now claiming that the media are covering up terrorist attacks because they love Muslims more than the USA. I'm not even exaggerating.
I'm sitting on the fence right now tbh
I assume he then went on to tell us which ones.
Someone's going to have to Ol' Yella him at some point.
He's not wrong. But it's not that they love terrorists, it's just they are atheists who love the idea of being 'tolerant' and virtue signaling to fulfill the emotional vacuum in their soul once filled by religious belief. It's essentially a selfish act.
Simple questions in reply.
What terrorist acts by Muslims have been covered up by the media?
What has Trumps or the Trump administrations comments on the right-wing nationalist who shot up a Mosque just North of the border been?
How about every single attack? You clearly weren't following the coverage after the Orlando shootings, focusing on how "it has nothing to do with Islam!!!" and "this is an issue of gun control and access to guns by mentally ill individuals!!!" ending with a "don't be racist!!!"
Obama can't even bring himself to say Islamic extremism, because terrorism "has nothing to do with Islam." They obfuscate and ignore the problem. He is right. Have you heard about the recent attacks in Minnesota by Somali immigrants btw? Of course not.
That's me convinced.
edit: Are you in Europe or the States right now?
Not so much with the covering up then.
I go to law school in the States breh.
That's not covering things up, it's just reporting them differently than Trump, or you apparently, would like.
Have the Somalians been up to anything naughty since that nutter stabbed a few people in a shopping centre?
I was going to give you a pass for being too drunk to bother giving me examples but that makes it somewhere around 4PM.
Here's what your team is going to do instead
This is going to lead to them reporting a bunch of 'FBI buys weapons for people and then arrests them for buying weapons' stories. It's hilarious.
I mean he does have access to classified information, maybe there are a bunch of terror cells being thwarted that we never hear about.
We've gone from Hilary transferring a few classified e-mails via private server to disclosing top secret counter terrorist information in how many weeks?
Mert, look at the state of it, you have to laugh.
Is that a 'no' on the Somalians being up to no good since that one bloke stabbed some people? Something which happened about six months ago and was very well reported on by UK media. Sky even got the 'BREAKING NEWS' banner out for it.
Ohio State car attack.
Wait you skipped my questions!
I see. I made the mistake of thinking 'in Minnesota' meant the attack would actually have happened in Minnesota. I keep forgetting that you can't express yourself with any degree of precision.
If these cells are being thwarted then there were no attacks. This stuff covers itself up.
Furthermore, it all happened on Barack's watch so he can't claim credit.
So instead they released a list of terrorist attacks that have happened. Boring. Shitty distraction from incompetence game.
See, I don't want to be that guy... but this is basically the fake news we keep hearing about. Somebody claimed it was on the front page, when actually it appeared in the cartoon section of the English language version of the site, you cuck libtard.Front page of the print edition apparently. I'll see if I can find the tweet.
edit: @John Arne
Here's a screen of the app
Toggle Spoiler
Reply With Quote
