User Tag List

Page 11 of 36 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 501 to 550 of 1786

Thread: The yankee mass shootings thread

  1. #501
    Senior Member Jimmy Floyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    36,966
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mert View Post
    How many times do I have to say this, mass shootings do not happen in suburban America, any more than they happen in Europe. An example, America's safest city over a population of 250,000 is Plano, Texas with a homicide rate of 0.4 (which is lower than the countries of Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Denmark, etc.). I'm at work so I can't be bothered to find the exact numbers, but Texas almost undoubtedly has a higher incidence of average gun ownership than the US as a whole, and the US has the highest civilian gun ownership rate out of any country in the world, by a lot.

    So the main take away: there are places in America where crime is lower than nearly anywhere else on earth, where the citizenry is armed more heavily than anywhere else on earth.

    Guns. Are. Not. The. Problem.
    Right, and the price you pay for that is the fact that a dangerous nutcase is easily able to kill 50 people in a bar because they can easily access the weaponry needed to do so.

    We have the same nutters in other western countries but they simply don't have access to that killing power.

  2. #502
    Senior Member Davgooner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,487
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Apparently there were armed police in the club, so I wonder how many people died in the crossfire as opposed to being directly targeted by the madman.

  3. #503
    Custom User Title phonics's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    18,761
    Mentioned
    120 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mert View Post
    We just going to pretend deterrence doesn't exist or?
    Think the Death Penalty has kinda proved that one true.

  4. #504
    Senior Member randomlegend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    11,969
    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mert View Post
    There's a difference between 'unlikely' and 'impossible'.
    There is, but neither of those things are impossible.

    Where exactly do you draw the line?

  5. #505
    More successful than most Magic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Scotchland
    Posts
    18,968
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Davgooner View Post
    Apparently there were armed police in the club, so I wonder how many people died in the crossfire as opposed to being directly targeted by the madman.
    Before the gunman attacked? Are they that afraid of gays?

  6. #506
    I used to be funny.
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    22,382
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mert View Post
    Ya I'm sure that the person about to murder you will wait for the police to show up to protect you before proceeding.
    I'm sure every gun-carrying criminal in the US immediately jumps to murder.

  7. #507
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Floyd View Post
    Right, and the price you pay for that is the fact that a dangerous nutcase is easily able to kill 50 people in a bar because they can easily access the weaponry needed to do so.

    We have the same nutters in other western countries but they simply don't have access to that killing power.
    I don't understand why you don't get this. Our gun crime levels are very similar when you compare European nations and the US along demographic lines. There is no problem.

  8. #508
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Davgooner View Post
    Apparently there were armed police in the club, so I wonder how many people died in the crossfire as opposed to being directly targeted by the madman.
    Link.

    Just goes to show that police men aren't sufficientnly reliable to protect citizens and that private individuals need to be armed to protect themselves.

  9. #509
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Shindig View Post
    I'm sure every gun-carrying criminal in the US immediately jumps to murder.
    The point is simple; you don't have time to wait for the police to protect you if your life or the lives of your family are in danger.

  10. #510
    Senior Member Pepe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,296
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    'We have no crime issues, except where we do. But apart from those places, yes, no crime issues here.'

  11. #511
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Pepe View Post
    'We have no crime issues, except where we do. But apart from those places, yes, no crime issues here.'
    The point is there are areas with very high gun ownership with very low crime, lower even that of European nations with gun control. If little or no gun regulation is the independent variable responsible for higher rates of gun crime, these anomalies would not exist.

  12. #512
    Senior Member Davgooner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,487
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No link; heard it on the radio last night so could be bollocks. Just interested in the possibilities rather than making any specific point.

  13. #513
    Senior Member Pepe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,296
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mert View Post
    The point is there are areas with very high gun ownership with very low crime, lower even that of European nations with gun control. If little or no gun regulation is the independent variable responsible for higher rates of gun crime, these anomalies would not exist.
    Everyone but you is focusing on mass shootings, not general crime. While I don't think gun availability is the #1 reason for the stupidly high amount of mass shootings that occur over here, I find it hard to believe that it has nothing to do with it. Then you have to consider the number of accidental gun deaths that happen every year.

    As for 'general crime,' I would think gun availability is a secondary factor and not just a matter of more guns = more crime.

    I understand that (some) Americans like the feeling of self-reliability that guns give them. I just don't think that feeling is enough of a positive to balance the negatives. Still, gun control isn't one of my top priorities, there are many more issues I would prefer were tackled first and if anything, the fact that the response to every shooting (how many do we get? something like two a month?) is yet another shoutfest about gun control gets a bit boring.

  14. #514
    Senior Member Disco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,280
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    He didn't listen 3 pages back so don't get your hopes up.

  15. #515
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Pepe View Post
    Everyone but you is focusing on mass shootings, not general crime. While I don't think gun availability is the #1 reason for the stupidly high amount of mass shootings that occur over here, I find it hard to believe that it has nothing to do with it. Then you have to consider the number of accidental gun deaths that happen every year.

    As for 'general crime,' I would think gun availability is a secondary factor and not just a matter of more guns = more crime.

    I understand that (some) Americans like the feeling of self-reliability that guns give them. I just don't think that feeling is enough of a positive to balance the negatives. Still, gun control isn't one of my top priorities, there are many more issues I would prefer were tackled first and if anything, the fact that the response to every shooting (how many do we get? something like two a month?) is yet another shoutfest about gun control gets a bit boring.
    Well if we're focusing on mass shootings only, there's the whole debate about how to define a "mass shooting", how the vast majority of them happen in gun-free zones, etc. It gets messy and I don't think non-Americans are really equipped to go that deep into the gun debate.

    And yes, I am happy to concede that it is established beyond any reasonable doubt that higher gun ownership does correspond with higher suicide rates and accidental shootings. The morbid / dark side of me might half-jokingly respond that that's just Darwinism at work.

    I would argue that even if the negatives outweigh the positives (in terms of short term safety), this does not justify taking away our freedom as individuals. Heck, you could probably argue that a society which implemented sexual segregation outside a heavily regulated / monitored mating process / IVF insemination would probably suffer from far fewer sexual assaults as a result; but what's the point of safety without the freedom to exercise your freewill? Maximum safety shouldn't even be a desired end in and of itself.

  16. #516
    Senior Member Disco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,280
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Four or more is the definition of 'mass' in this context.

  17. #517
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Disco View Post
    Four or more is the definition of 'mass' in this context.
    Deaths or casualties?

  18. #518
    Administrator SvN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    6,731
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43004.pdf

    There is no broadly agreed-to, specific conceptualization of this issue, so this report uses its own definition for public mass shootings. These are incidents occurring in relatively public places, involving four or more deaths—not ncluding the shooter(s)—and gunmen who select victims somewhat indiscriminately.

  19. #519
    Senior Member Disco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,280
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sorry, it's the definition of Mass Killings initially put forward by the FBI and then re-assessed by Congress. They seem to disagree if it should be three or four so I'm taking the higher number.

  20. #520
    Senior Member Lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    2,883
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...ando-sexuality

    Now I might be being thick, but my take on Jones having a mardy last night was that it was because he wanted it to only be reported as a homophobic attack. When watching I thought he was a knob and that whilst it was clearly a homophobic attack, it was also some other things too.

    Now he is making the opposite argument to the one I thought he was making.

  21. #521
    Senior Member Pepe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,296
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mert View Post
    I would argue that even if the negatives outweigh the positives (in terms of short term safety), this does not justify taking away our freedom as individuals.
    You know, I do have some respect for the 'freedom' arguments and a few people out there do manage to show at least a degree of consistency with it. But it seems that the only 'freedom' right-wing Americans care about is the freedom to own guns. They are happy to jump aboard the 'ban abortion/gay marriage/drugs/anything-I-don't-like-train,' freedom be damned in all those cases. How about shit like, say, the speed limit? Why is no one chimping out about that clear violation of our freedom to drive as we please? Society is built on the premise of resigning some freedom in the name of stability. I don't think giving up the right to own firearms is that big of a deal. Obviously about half of the country disagrees with me, that's fine. I would gladly take something like universal healthcare over any sort of ban on guns, for example.

  22. #522
    Senior Member Lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    2,883
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "Today, the 'we only care about LGBT rights if Muslims are involved' brigade are out in force."

    Yeah, fuck off mate.

  23. #523
    Senior Member Pepe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,296
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee View Post
    "Today, the 'we only care about LGBT rights if Muslims are involved' brigade are out in force."

    Yeah, fuck off mate.
    That's pretty lol.

  24. #524
    Senior Member Davgooner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,487
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A lot of truth in that sadly.

  25. #525
    Senior Member Disco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,280
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    'Out in force' is such a shithouse phrase.

  26. #526
    Won the Old Board Lewis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Hull
    Posts
    27,655
    Mentioned
    136 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee View Post
    http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...ando-sexuality

    Now I might be being thick, but my take on Jones having a mardy last night was that it was because he wanted it to only be reported as a homophobic attack. When watching I thought he was a knob and that whilst it was clearly a homophobic attack, it was also some other things too.

    Now he is making the opposite argument to the one I thought he was making.
    It was not so much only wanting to portray it as homophobic as not making it about Muslims, which the other two were groping towards without also really wanting to say it (like this bloke lives for).

  27. #527
    Romulus Augustulus ItalAussie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    3,279
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In fairness, it is morbidly interesting watching social conservative figures express their condolences while carefully tip-toeing around the LGBT component of the crime.

  28. #528
    More successful than most Magic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Scotchland
    Posts
    18,968
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sick bastard to get off on something like that. Mea Maxima Culpa.

  29. #529
    Romulus Augustulus ItalAussie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    3,279
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Also, this guy really does seem like the type who wouldn't be able to get a gun if they weren't easily for sale. He seems to have been a lone operator with a very short fuse. It's not like had a network of criminal contacts who could import it for him.

    The "bad guys will still get guns" argument seems to collect everyone into a great big criminal bloc, with all the access that provides. The reality is that a lot of these loners are quite isolated, and would never be able to find that kind of equipment in, for example, the UK.

  30. #530
    More successful than most Magic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Scotchland
    Posts
    18,968
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Has anyone mentioned he actually had a firearm license?

  31. #531
    Senior Member Jimmy Floyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    36,966
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ItalAussie View Post
    In fairness, it is morbidly interesting watching social conservative figures express their condolences while carefully tip-toeing around the LGBT component of the crime.
    This sort of thing breaks various people's brains, as depending on which side of the spectrum they're on, they think Muslims and gays are both violently evil / can do no wrong (delete as appropriate) and find it difficult to add nuance.

  32. #532
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ItalAussie View Post
    Also, this guy really does seem like the type who wouldn't be able to get a gun if they weren't easily for sale. He seems to have been a lone operator with a very short fuse. It's not like had a network of criminal contacts who could import it for him.

    The "bad guys will still get guns" argument seems to collect everyone into a great big criminal bloc, with all the access that provides. The reality is that a lot of these loners are quite isolated, and would never be able to find that kind of equipment in, for example, the UK.
    Drugs are illegal and easy to buy. Don't know why guns wouldn't be the same.

  33. #533
    Senior Member Disco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,280
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's a fatuous argument because drugs are far harder to buy than normal groceries.

  34. #534
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Disco View Post
    That's a fatuous argument because drugs are far harder to buy than normal groceries.
    Yeah but if you wanted to buy drugs you can easily do it. If you wanted to buy a gun you could easily do it. I would think that if you have the resolve to kill a bunch of people, you're not going to be deterred by having to put a little bit extra effort.

  35. #535
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Pepe View Post
    You know, I do have some respect for the 'freedom' arguments and a few people out there do manage to show at least a degree of consistency with it. But it seems that the only 'freedom' right-wing Americans care about is the freedom to own guns. They are happy to jump aboard the 'ban abortion/gay marriage/drugs/anything-I-don't-like-train,' freedom be damned in all those cases. How about shit like, say, the speed limit? Why is no one chimping out about that clear violation of our freedom to drive as we please? Society is built on the premise of resigning some freedom in the name of stability. I don't think giving up the right to own firearms is that big of a deal. Obviously about half of the country disagrees with me, that's fine. I would gladly take something like universal healthcare over any sort of ban on guns, for example.
    Those 'conservatives' are frauds; the issue isn't the ideology.

    I agree there should be democratically/legislatively delineated restraints on freedom, but last time I checked the 2nd Amendment still existed.

  36. #536
    Romulus Augustulus ItalAussie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    3,279
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The lack of gun proliferation in countries with gun restrictions like Australian and the UK suggests otherwise.

    However, I do agree with you on the second amendment. As much as I wouldn't write it if I were writing a constitution, it's definitely there. I mean, you could argue what constitutes a militia, etc., but it seems like the current interpretation has generally held up in court.

  37. #537
    Senior Member Disco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,280
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mert View Post
    Yeah but if you wanted to buy drugs you can easily do it. If you wanted to buy a gun you could easily do it. I would think that if you have the resolve to kill a bunch of people, you're not going to be deterred by having to put a little bit extra effort.
    So because people could still break the law there's no point in having one?

    You're going to have a lot of spare room in your statute book if you follow that logic.

  38. #538
    Senior Member Pepe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,296
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The 'criminals will still get them' argument is pretty weak. At least use the 'how are we going to remove them?' one, it is a bit stronger.

  39. #539
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ItalAussie View Post
    The lack of gun proliferation in countries with gun restrictions like Australian and the UK suggests otherwise.

    However, I do agree with you on the second amendment. As much as I wouldn't write it if I were writing a constitution, it's definitely there. I mean, you could argue what constitutes a militia, etc., but it seems like the current interpretation has generally held up in court.
    They are islands, it is much easier to control your borders.

    US v. Heller (2008)

  40. #540
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Disco View Post
    So because people could still break the law there's no point in having one?

    You're going to have a lot of spare room in your statute book if you follow that logic.
    It's about reciprocal application. If I have a traffic law, everyone is safer if most people follow that law. If I have a gun regulation, those who follow the law are less safe than those who don't.

    Toggle Spoiler

  41. #541
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SvN View Post
    Okay let's go with that:

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...ones-full-data

    There have been 81 mass shooting in the last 35 years; or about 2.3 per year with an average of 17 deaths per year. Hardly an epidemic. Yes every death is a tragedy, but to put that into perspective 450 people die falling out of their bed per year in the USA; it is literally 2,600% more likely for you to die getting out of bed than you are from being a victim of a mass shooting.

  42. #542
    Senior Member niko_cee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,878
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nice spoiler. Considering how many durwoods shoot themselves by accident I would imagine it is total bollocks.

  43. #543
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by niko_cee View Post
    Nice spoiler. Considering how many durwoods shoot themselves by accident I would imagine it is total bollocks.
    It's about safety from others, not from yourself and/or something about intent.

  44. #544
    Senior Member niko_cee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,878
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm fairly sure it's been shown that your overall 'safety' goes down if you own a gun (ie it is more likely to cause you harm than save you from harm). You can't only assess it's relative value in an armed intruder situation. Even then, seeing as I would imagine any sane individual would keep it locked away somewhere it's probably still fairly useless. You should just scatter landmines about before going to bed each night.

  45. #545
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by niko_cee View Post
    I'm fairly sure it's been shown that your overall 'safety' goes down if you own a gun (ie it is more likely to cause you harm than save you from harm). You can't only assess it's relative value in an armed intruder situation. Even then, seeing as I would imagine any sane individual would keep it locked away somewhere it's probably still fairly useless. You should just scatter landmines about before going to bed each night.
    Yes that's why I was precluding injury done to self and/or requiring intent.

  46. #546
    I used to be funny.
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    22,382
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So let's spin this for a second and say that there's a mental health crisis in the United States. For the sake of that, gun restrictions seems like a good idea, right? You have to stop seeing guns as a defence weapon and see it more as a weapon that can end more lives quicker than knives or homemade explosives. I mean, look at the perps of these massacres. All headcases. Headcases with easy access to firearms.

    Britain arguably has a similar issue but, without the access, our headcases maybe get away with one brutal murder, rather than 20+.

  47. #547
    Senior Member Pepe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,296
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The liberal media and its usual BS:

    http://www.thenation.com/article/com...inger-fantasy/

    I could quote half of the article, so you should read it instead. I will, however, quote this part:

     A case in Texas two weeks ago highlights the risks of civilians intervening in chaotic situations. Police say that as two carjackers struggled with the owner of a car at a gas station in northeast Houston, a witness decided to take action into his own hands. He fired several shots, but missed the perpetrators and shot the owner of the car in the head. He then picked up his shell casings and fled the scene. Police are still looking for the shooter.

  48. #548
    Senior Member niko_cee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,878
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Imagine opening fire at a petrol station. What could possibly go wrong?

  49. #549
    Custom User Title phonics's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    18,761
    Mentioned
    120 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Whats the hymn/song referenced here? My ears are absolutely awful at understanding lyrics when sung by crowds.

  50. #550
    Senior Member Gray Fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    16,159
    Mentioned
    107 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bridge over troubled water. Sounds pretty clear.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •