The candidates weren't really 'narrowed down' as that suggests Burnham is one of those three, which is not necessarily the case. The real narrowing occurs when Burnham votes or they forego their kill.
The candidates weren't really 'narrowed down' as that suggests Burnham is one of those three, which is not necessarily the case. The real narrowing occurs when Burnham votes or they forego their kill.
Didn't really know what to call it. Secondly nominated? Put up for lynch vote?
So are we spreading THE SIX out amongst the three nominees or what?
Originally Posted by niko_cee
Yeah I'll just leave it then.
It makes me ever so slightly nervous to not use my vote on anyone, since I'm actually nominated myself and may not be able to cast it later if I really need to. But I'll just leave it in your capable hands and hope you don't lynch me. I suppose my vote wouldn't matter much anyway if you set your mind to it.
Wait, we are? I thought we were abstaining.
Oh, the six are abstaining and everyone else just votes for who they want? Fine by me.
Yeah, we either don't vote, or vote for the losers, to work out who Burnham is (as he will either vote for the winner or no night kill). The easiest way to do it is to not vote. Although there is the very real possibility that we (being those in this chosen six) are the only people actually playing the game, so there could be no votes at all. Catastrophic triple lynch/narrator led massacre.
Yeah let's just vote and spread them evenly like before. With how few votes there were the last time around, we need the voting keep the game alive if nothing else. There's also the fact of the fewer the votes, the larger the influence of the non-Burnham wolves if they do vote, right? Although it wouldn't surprise me if they were amongst the non-voters either.
Maz - Vim - Browning
Maz - Vim - Browning
As per the nomination.
No, no, no, no, no. You're signing your own death warrant by doing this (edit @ Maz). What if the town choose Vim and more than one of us get on him?
There aren't enough candidates to spread 6 votes around without risking being on the winning side - considering about 10 people usually vote.
Maz - Vim - Browning
Disappointed that Niko isn't here too as Burnham is either him or Maz.
I like the cases against Maz and Vim but should I vote Browning to spread it out?
So if Maz has gone and broken the 'no vote' pact should we just screw it and THE SIX spread their votes out?
Maz - Vim - Browning
Niko should've been up too. I'm surprised no one seconded my nomination. Of these three, I think Vim is the most suspicious.
No, as long as nobody else votes (of the six) then the theory still holds.
That was supposed to have 7om's post quoted.
One vanilla villager can get themselves in the clear by backing the winning horse and there being no night kill, but as soon as more than 1 does that it falls apart.
OK just popping in now again - on my way out but - Should I retract my vote then?
I'll just leave it, have to run, since you're saying it should be fine, Niko.
Maz - ]Vim - Browning
Thought Mahow made some sense earlier in the nomination, but I can't actually remember what was said now.
Regardless, I'll go with it.
Maz - Vim - Browning
As I mentioned earlier I think Vim is the most suspicious of the 6 possible who could have been Burnham.
Im out now for the evening. Lets try and follow niko's plan and not mess up
The cap is 50 items so I've had to delete everything a couple of times over.
Ok, I'm fine with not voting if that's what has been decided, so long as Merse isn't going to start kicking people out for not voting.
How about you all grow a pair and do whatever the fuck you want rather than pandering to a few individuals with a 'plan for the town'.
Those fucking individuals who are playing you like puppets could very well be fucking wolves and you're lapping it up.
I'll be looking at activity levels over the weekend, just not voting for a round won't see anyone killed off. Non-engagement will, a brief glance suggests only one or two anywhere near that.
Bloody usual suspect #1 mind......
So we're at 3-3-0
Keep a running tally from here on, please.
Personally, I'd like to see Vim go. He's been bugging me since the start of the game, and I think he's the most likely wolf, having appeared on both lists. However there's a good case to be made for Maz too. I don't feel strongly enough about either to risk voting for them in these circumstances. It seems one of them will go, and I'm happy with that outcome.
Mahow is the biggest wolf going here. He didn't stick with original plan, which worked flawlessly. He's hounded Pepe, a decent villager out, now I'm in line when Burnham doesn't vote for the kill tonight and I don't either. Bear this in mind. Whatever the outcome, it is better for the town if none of the potential Burnham's vote. Unless 5 get on the winning ticket and Burnham doesn't. Let's see how well that works.
I'm prepared not to vote in order to aid the town in finding Burnham, but come 9pm I'm going to vote to save my own skin. Think that's best.
Maz - Vim - Browning
3-4-0.
Fairly ill, in bed and likely to fall asleep before write ups.
So - the voting has been extended to 12pm tomorrow afternoon to give me time to write up kills etc.
Sorry chaps, been battling a cold that's getting worse all week and now just need to give in a bit for a night.
12pm is 7am here so it's safe to say I won't be awake for it.
Maz -Vim - Browning
4-4-0.
Maz - Vim - Browning
As I said before, I see the cases against Maz and Vim but I think I 'like' Vim for this more. I don't think any of the three have done anything overtly suspicious but of the cases we have I find Vim's the most compelling, such as it is. Or least compelling, whichever way you want to see it.
4-5-0.
Not that I know if I'm entirely comfortable with Browning getting off so easy but voting for him might be more trouble than it's worth.
Ok I'm back. This isn't working out right. We're meant to spread the votes, guys.
Since we're getting some extra time (can people sort themselves out and vote, please?) :
Maz - Vim - Browning
I would like to change my vote from Player X to the one now indicated above.
I.e. - NOBODY
I'm probably getting myself killed here (), but I'd rather try to do this properly.
EDIT: this still just means everyone else suspected should be spreading the votes. To avoid a double or triple kill I'd suggest getting a vote or two more on Vim then giving Browning a few votes...
Oh, look at that. Mazuuurk is hoping to get two people lopped off by switching his vote around.
I wonder why?
Maz -Vim - Browning
5-4-1. Evenly spread votes always favours the wolves. Double lynches are disasters.
As he is Burnham he can create a split and have them both killed too...
Christ
How does changing my vote to Browning possibly benefit me in any way? You realize It greatly increases the risk of me dying myself, Mahow? In which case - if I would indeed be Burnham - I wouldn't even get a kill for it...
I had a brain fart there, apologies.
I blame my lack of sleep.
I've no idea what Maz is doing here.
That said Panda and Mahow, how interesting.
I'm trying to spread the votes - which was the original idea - since nobody was voting for Browning (which I don't understand). It seems I'm going to get lynched for it., though.
Spreading the votes is phase 1 of find Burnham. Phase 2 is to have everybody accused of being Burnham not vote for the person who gets lynched, so Burnham has to either choose to have no night kill, or to reveal himself. The potential Burnhams spreading their votes around is dumb. You'll let the wolves have a kill, and probably still only have a 50-50 at getting him next turn.
Encouraging other Burnhams to vote should probably be a burn(ham)able offence. I take it back if you were right Mahow.
This is falling apart at the seems. THE SIX do not vote and everyone else keepit tight and stay calm. It's not difficult.
I thought you said it didn't matter if I had voted as long as no one else did, but I can just retract my vote then?
Edited my vote-change to nobody. It should make the current score:
5-4-0.
I'm still dying just as much, of course
Well, I guess not. As the one voter I was thinking it is best you side with the winners, and thereby seal your fate as either Burnham or not Burnham. But then I thought maybe the wolves could forego a night kill voluntarily and that would fuck everything up, so, yeah, I don't know. Probably stay off the winner and hope Burnham breaks? Not being on the winning vote is no different to not voting.
Jesus christ man just tell me what the fuck I'm supposed to do here
I'm not trying to tell you what to do, I'm just trying to explain what would make sense. DON'T VOTE FOR THE WINNER is the best I can do. There are other permutations, but they are too complicated.
I didn't clock that post and vote edit.
Dear lord.
Jesus fuck.
Either Maz is playing an incredibly good game to shift all attention from himself or he's the worst wolf in history.
I'm now pretty damn sure that Niko is Burnham.
Dunno about this. Purposefully not voting seems kind of wrong to me.
Thanks for this, btw. Although its still a bit confusing. I need to spend Sunday re-reading the thread I think
Reply With Quote
